| 5 Mar 2024 |
|  @nscnt:matrix.org left the room. | 18:32:57 |
| 6 Mar 2024 |
|  @sammy:cherrykitten.dev joined the room. | 19:04:52 |
|  @ktemkin:katesiria.org joined the room. | 22:28:08 |
| 8 Mar 2024 |
 infinisil | @room The architecture team is being dissolved, please check out https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nixpkgs-architecture-team-conclusion-and-prospective/41020 for all the details! | 16:55:26 |
 Philip Taron (UTC-8) |
at some point somebody should just be empowered to make decisions.
♥️
| 16:56:13 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | *
at some point somebody should just be empowered to make decisions.
♥️ to this
| 16:56:30 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | I'm a little sad that this action is being taken:
Publicly archive the private Nixpkgs Architecture Matrix channel
... as having "direct line" to those interested in architecture and structure rather than the things being built with the structure is quite nice.
| 16:57:45 |
 nbp | I agree that keeping this channel might still be valuable. | 16:58:10 |
 Alyssa Ross | This room is being kept | 16:58:15 |
| Alyssa Ross | the "private Nixpkgs Architecture Matrix channel" is not this room | 16:58:24 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | In reply to @qyliss:fairydust.space
the "private Nixpkgs Architecture Matrix channel" is not this room 👀 I see | 16:58:44 |
| Alyssa Ross | This is "The public Nixpkgs Architecture Matrix room for ephemeral discussions", listed under "The following will continue to exist:" | 16:58:49 |
| nbp | why was there a private channel then? | 16:59:11 |
 @piegames:matrix.org | Is that question still relevant now? | 17:04:25 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | * I'm a little sad that this action is being taken:
Publicly archive the private Nixpkgs Architecture Matrix channel
... as having "direct line" to those interested in architecture and structure rather than the things being built with the structure is quite nice.
Sadness over: this room stays.
| 17:08:35 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | * I'm a little sad that this action is being taken:
Publicly archive the private Nixpkgs Architecture Matrix channel
... as having "direct line" to those interested in architecture and structure rather than the things being built with the structure is quite nice.
Sadness over: this room stays.
| 17:08:51 |
| nbp | I curious to understand what justified taking discussion in private instead of using this channel? | 17:14:43 |
| nbp | * I am curious to understand what justified taking discussion in private instead of using this channel? | 17:14:51 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | *
at some point somebody should just be empowered to make decisions.
♥️ to this
| 17:17:42 |
 @jonringer:matrix.org |
Is that question still relevant now?
I think creating walls and barriers to contributions is always a relevant question in a FOSS community
| 17:26:39 |
| infinisil | It's main purpose was to discuss member applications and whether to approve them | 17:27:41 |
| infinisil | Btw I documented the existence of such a private room here | 17:32:23 |
| @jonringer:matrix.org | I think I just have a philosophical opposition to making decisions "behind closed doors". Sure not everything has to be public record, but there should be some transparency. | 17:39:08 |
| infinisil | Agreed. I'd never want to make decisions in such a private room, and indeed we never did | 17:44:10 |
| infinisil | (well the NAT can't really make a decision anyways since it has no authority anyways, would be more important if that wasn't the case) | 17:44:37 |
