| 14 Jun 2023 |
 hexa | 
Download image.png | 16:43:00 |
 Robert Hensing (roberth) | because that's what builtins.derviation cares about | 16:43:07 |
| hexa | as long as this situation would get fixed along the way I'll take it | 16:43:17 |
| hexa | the first package is actually called solanum, the second package is some gnome extension in some namespace | 16:43:41 |
| hexa | but yeah, silly pname parsing | 16:43:50 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | can't promise that attr names and package names will match (they won't) but these things all sound very solveable | 16:44:21 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | though I'll acknowledge that some people might wonder where their version number went | 16:44:52 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | don't make me tap the sign ;) https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/6507 | 16:45:42 |
 John Ericson | https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/4955 this also is making me realize that Nixpkgs Command is very important | 17:04:42 |
| John Ericson | and could perhaps merit a working group | 17:04:47 |
| John Ericson | though I suppose one can always just make a thing, and then it grows organically | 17:05:00 |
 K900 (deprecated) | I really want this to be a thing | 21:17:27 |
| K900 (deprecated) | And have no time for anything :( | 21:17:47 |
 infinisil | I think we should try to create streamlined process for creating WG's, it worked decently well for the packages modules WG one: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/working-group-member-search-module-system-for-packages/26574 | 21:19:38 |
| 15 Jun 2023 |
|  pneumatic joined the room. | 16:40:07 |
| 16 Jun 2023 |
 @piegames:matrix.org | So, what's the timeline for RFC 140? Is it ready to be marked ready for review again? | 08:03:41 |
| @piegames:matrix.org | Also I think the implementation PR can already be changed to by-name, as this seems to be our best bet right now | 08:04:58 |
| infinisil | piegames: I'm busy until Monday, but I'll try to get the update done today. Note also the last NAT meeting where there was agreement to change it to by-name. So we just need confirmation from all shepherds | 09:01:58 |
| @piegames:matrix.org | Count that as a +1 from me | 09:03:08 |
 phaer | +1 from me as well, just in case matrix reactions aren't enough :) | 10:31:30 |
| phaer | Reminder: There will be a presentation on https://github.com/DavHau/drv-parts by DavHau in todays pkg-modules meeting at 13h UTC (15h CEST) - in ~2,5h
The meeting is open to everyone at https://meet.jit.si/wg-pkgs-modules, and infinisil scheduled a YoutTube stream at https://youtube.com/live/FmaFOlKRUKw
| 10:35:15 |
 @syphoxy:matrix.org | thanks for the UTC. | 11:05:17 |
| infinisil | phaer j-k growpotkin ( Alex Ameen ) piegames: I updated the RFC, can you approve it on GitHub again if you agree with the changes? See https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/140#issuecomment-1594625831 and the latest commit | 12:51:03 |
| infinisil | phaer: (I was thinking with a GitHub approving review :P) | 12:53:47 |
| phaer | okay okay ;) | 12:54:08 |
| phaer | I'll do the clicking | 12:54:21 |
| infinisil | Just to make it easier for the steering committee to verify it :) | 12:54:25 |
| infinisil | (or anybody really, not just the committee) | 12:54:51 |
| phaer | yes, i agree it's nicer to see it right at the top | 12:55:44 |
| infinisil | GitHub doesn't invalidate old reviews when changes were done though, so the old approvals are still visible at the top, but the latest history entry in the PR makes it verifiable :) | 12:56:52 |
