!djTaTBQyWEPRQxrPTb:nixos.org

Nixpkgs Architecture Team

231 Members
https://github.com/nixpkgs-architecture, weekly public meetings on Wednesday 15:00-16:00 UTC at https://meet.jit.si/nixpkgs-architecture52 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
14 Jun 2023
@roberthensing:matrix.orgRobert Hensing (roberth)exactly. It matches the store path name part16:42:48
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaimage.png
Download image.png
16:43:00
@roberthensing:matrix.orgRobert Hensing (roberth) because that's what builtins.derviation cares about 16:43:07
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaas long as this situation would get fixed along the way I'll take it16:43:17
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa the first package is actually called solanum, the second package is some gnome extension in some namespace 16:43:41
@hexa:lossy.networkhexabut yeah, silly pname parsing16:43:50
@roberthensing:matrix.orgRobert Hensing (roberth)can't promise that attr names and package names will match (they won't) but these things all sound very solveable16:44:21
@roberthensing:matrix.orgRobert Hensing (roberth)though I'll acknowledge that some people might wonder where their version number went16:44:52
@roberthensing:matrix.orgRobert Hensing (roberth) don't make me tap the sign ;) https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/6507 16:45:42
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn Ericsonhttps://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/4955 this also is making me realize that Nixpkgs Command is very important17:04:42
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn Ericsonand could perhaps merit a working group17:04:47
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn Ericsonthough I suppose one can always just make a thing, and then it grows organically17:05:00
@k900:conduit.0upti.meK900 (deprecated)I really want this to be a thing 21:17:27
@k900:conduit.0upti.meK900 (deprecated)And have no time for anything :(21:17:47
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilI think we should try to create streamlined process for creating WG's, it worked decently well for the packages modules WG one: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/working-group-member-search-module-system-for-packages/2657421:19:38
15 Jun 2023
@mon:tchncs.depneumatic joined the room.16:40:07
16 Jun 2023
@piegames:matrix.org@piegames:matrix.orgSo, what's the timeline for RFC 140? Is it ready to be marked ready for review again?08:03:41
@piegames:matrix.org@piegames:matrix.org Also I think the implementation PR can already be changed to by-name, as this seems to be our best bet right now 08:04:58
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil piegames: I'm busy until Monday, but I'll try to get the update done today. Note also the last NAT meeting where there was agreement to change it to by-name. So we just need confirmation from all shepherds 09:01:58
@piegames:matrix.org@piegames:matrix.orgCount that as a +1 from me09:03:08
@phaer:matrix.orgphaer+1 from me as well, just in case matrix reactions aren't enough :)10:31:30
@phaer:matrix.orgphaer

Reminder: There will be a presentation on https://github.com/DavHau/drv-parts by DavHau in todays pkg-modules meeting at 13h UTC (15h CEST) - in ~2,5h

The meeting is open to everyone at https://meet.jit.si/wg-pkgs-modules, and infinisil scheduled a YoutTube stream at https://youtube.com/live/FmaFOlKRUKw

10:35:15
@syphoxy:matrix.org@syphoxy:matrix.orgthanks for the UTC.11:05:17
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil phaer j-k growpotkin ( Alex Ameen ) piegames: I updated the RFC, can you approve it on GitHub again if you agree with the changes? See https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/140#issuecomment-1594625831 and the latest commit 12:51:03
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil phaer: (I was thinking with a GitHub approving review :P) 12:53:47
@phaer:matrix.orgphaerokay okay ;)12:54:08
@phaer:matrix.orgphaerI'll do the clicking12:54:21
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilJust to make it easier for the steering committee to verify it :)12:54:25
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil(or anybody really, not just the committee)12:54:51
@phaer:matrix.orgphaeryes, i agree it's nicer to see it right at the top12:55:44

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9