| 14 Jun 2023 |
 Robert Hensing (roberth) | exactly. It matches the store path name part | 16:42:48 |
 hexa | 
Download image.png | 16:43:00 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | because that's what builtins.derviation cares about | 16:43:07 |
| hexa | as long as this situation would get fixed along the way I'll take it | 16:43:17 |
| hexa | the first package is actually called solanum, the second package is some gnome extension in some namespace | 16:43:41 |
| hexa | but yeah, silly pname parsing | 16:43:50 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | can't promise that attr names and package names will match (they won't) but these things all sound very solveable | 16:44:21 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | though I'll acknowledge that some people might wonder where their version number went | 16:44:52 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | don't make me tap the sign ;) https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/6507 | 16:45:42 |
 John Ericson | https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/4955 this also is making me realize that Nixpkgs Command is very important | 17:04:42 |
| John Ericson | and could perhaps merit a working group | 17:04:47 |
| John Ericson | though I suppose one can always just make a thing, and then it grows organically | 17:05:00 |
 K900 (deprecated) | I really want this to be a thing | 21:17:27 |
| K900 (deprecated) | And have no time for anything :( | 21:17:47 |
 infinisil | I think we should try to create streamlined process for creating WG's, it worked decently well for the packages modules WG one: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/working-group-member-search-module-system-for-packages/26574 | 21:19:38 |
