| 25 May 2023 |
| raitobezarius changed their display name from raitobezarius to disko in NixOS 23.11 when. | 13:32:18 |
| raitobezarius changed their display name from disko in NixOS 23.11 when to raitobezarius. | 13:37:25 |
| 26 May 2023 |
| SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) changed their display name from Someone (hates setup hooks) to Someone (still unhappy about setup hooks but oh well). | 10:47:10 |
Robert Hensing (roberth) | I won't be able to make the RFC 140 meeting due to traveling. Would have had a chance but got delayed. | 13:46:50 |
@piegames:matrix.org | We have one today? | 13:47:32 |
infinisil | Robert Hensing (roberth): There isn't another meeting | 13:47:35 |
@piegames:matrix.org | Tbf my calender shows one too | 13:47:53 |
infinisil | Huh, I thought I deleted it | 13:48:11 |
@piegames:matrix.org | But I still hope that no second meeting will be necessary | 13:48:23 |
| fgaz joined the room. | 18:23:53 |
| 27 May 2023 |
| NixOS Moderation Botchanged room power levels. | 16:40:03 |
infinisil | phaer: Can you also review/accept the RFC if you're content with it? Then we'd have an accepting review by all shepherds :D | 18:12:57 |
phaer | In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org phaer: Can you also review/accept the RFC if you're content with it? Then we'd have an accepting review by all shepherds :D Yes, it's on my list, I'll try to do so on Monday or Tuesday :) | 19:22:57 |
| 28 May 2023 |
| @printfn:matrix.org removed their profile picture. | 09:04:35 |
| 29 May 2023 |
phaer | Redacted or Malformed Event | 09:59:13 |
phaer | In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org phaer: Can you also review/accept the RFC if you're content with it? Then we'd have an accepting review by all shepherds :D Just did 👍️ | 09:59:33 |
@piegames:matrix.org | In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org phaer: Can you also review/accept the RFC if you're content with it? Then we'd have an accepting review by all shepherds :D You sure? I can't find the approval of j-k somehow | 10:17:40 |
j-k | added | 10:18:38 |
@piegames:matrix.org | Good. Given that the only remaining discussion point is around the name of the folder, I'd like to go and announce FCP. Before doing that, I'd like to get a go from one of the authors as well (infinisil, Robert Hensing (roberth)) | 10:25:17 |
infinisil | In reply to @piegames:matrix.org You sure? I can't find the approval of j-k somehow Oh yeah sorry I must've mixed something up! | 10:52:29 |
@piegames:matrix.org | Also in the FCP announcement I'll mention that the only open discussion point is the name of the folder, and that the currently proposed unit will be kept unless the discussion converges on a different name. | 10:54:46 |
infinisil | In reply to @piegames:matrix.org Good. Given that the only remaining discussion point is around the name of the folder, I'd like to go and announce FCP. Before doing that, I'd like to get a go from one of the authors as well (infinisil, Robert Hensing (roberth)) All good to me, I haven't pushed anything to the RFC I wouldn't be okay with, would like to hear from Robert Hensing (roberth) as well though. I think niksnut's arguments have been properly addressed here, but it might be proper to add the new arguments to the RFC as well. | 10:56:13 |
@piegames:matrix.org | tbf I disagree with a couple of points in that comment, but did not want to open a bigger discussion as it is not really central (I would have if GitHub had at least a minimum of threading …) | 11:00:09 |
infinisil | piegames: How about discussing that here, which points do you disagree with? | 11:00:42 |
@piegames:matrix.org | that was my plan, yes :) | 11:01:16 |
j-k | In reply to @piegames:matrix.org tbf I disagree with a couple of points in that comment, but did not want to open a bigger discussion as it is not really central (I would have if GitHub had at least a minimum of threading …) maybe RFC discussions should go in GH Discussions now? 🤷 | 11:01:31 |
Alyssa Ross | Discourse… | 11:02:07 |
infinisil | Let's not open this meta-discussion for now! | 11:02:49 |
@piegames:matrix.org |
if a new contributor opens up a folder and sees gazillion of 2-letter folders - he'll immediately close the tab and go read documentation about it. This is actually a desirable behavior.
For people who are not themselves familiar with sharding, it is best to read an explanation before interacting with it. For people who are - the contents of this folder will make sense immediately.
| 11:02:51 |
j-k | dies discourse actually have threads? I thought it was just quote replies? kind of like you already get in GH PRs | 11:02:57 |