| 15 May 2023 |
 Growpotkin | I'll check | 15:47:24 |
 Wanja Hentze | I feel like ideally, .. on the root should be made to fail (not in unix in general, just in lazy trees) | 15:49:18 |
| Growpotkin | yeah it hit my spam folder | 17:02:39 |
 infinisil | Ah darn, sorry for that :( | 17:03:11 |
| infinisil | I reported it, should get fixed at some point | 17:03:44 |
| 16 May 2023 |
| Growpotkin | Redacted or Malformed Event | 12:48:29 |
| Growpotkin | Redacted or Malformed Event | 12:48:30 |
 Robert Hensing (roberth) | In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org
It's a bit dangerous considering that lazy trees is very unstable and unreviewable, but considering it's only for a limited part of CI, and pinned, it might be okay, it would simplify the implementation a lot Keep calm and carry on | 13:26:07 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | Lazy trees isn't going anywhere until it works properly. I'll fight for that on the team | 13:27:31 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | not that I expect a fight actually | 13:27:49 |
| Growpotkin | infinisil: who among us doesn't love a fresh rewrite? ;) | 13:27:52 |
| Growpotkin | every engineer's dream | 13:27:59 |
| infinisil | Robert Hensing (roberth): Thanks <3 | 13:28:27 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | a rewrite with blackjack | 13:28:28 |
| Growpotkin | It's a bit like "man if I could go back to high school today I'd do so much different"; but like, for programming. It's delightful 😁 | 13:29:24 |
| infinisil | @room: The next meeting will take place in ~10 minutes - meeting link - live stream - meeting notes | 14:21:44 |
| infinisil | Robert Hensing (roberth): tomberek: Ping | 14:34:45 |
|  @zzantares:matrix.org left the room. | 15:11:57 |
 tomberek | pong | 17:40:04 |
|  @quantenzitrone:matrix.org joined the room. | 20:26:42 |
| 17 May 2023 |
|  @emilytrau:matrix.org joined the room. | 02:46:40 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | looks like the Simple Package Paths shepherds got approved: https://github.com/NixOS/rfc-steering-committee/issues/113 | 15:04:16 |
 @piegames:matrix.org | infinisil could you please update the RFC text to clarify that it is about nixpkgs? I agree that it kind of starts in the middle of the action where some context is implied. | 22:06:07 |
| @piegames:matrix.org | If you can also make the definition of "unit" more clear that would be great, but honestly I think it is good enough as-is | 22:06:29 |
| infinisil | piegames: Hmm, Nixpkgs is mentioned fairly early in the Detailed Design section | 22:14:42 |
| @piegames:matrix.org | In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org
piegames: Hmm, Nixpkgs is mentioned fairly early in the Detailed Design section Yeah that's good, I'm mostly concerned about the summary | 22:15:22 |
| infinisil | Ah fair | 22:15:55 |
| infinisil | piegames: Done, also pushed some updates about the recently discussed things | 22:49:04 |
| infinisil | * piegames: Done, also pushed some updates about the pkgs/unit thing | 22:49:16 |
| infinisil | Well, let me know if you think the summary should still be improved, I only added some Nixpkgs mentions, didn't change it very much | 22:50:57 |
