!djTaTBQyWEPRQxrPTb:nixos.org

Nixpkgs Architecture Team

232 Members
https://github.com/nixpkgs-architecture, weekly public meetings on Wednesday 15:00-16:00 UTC at https://meet.jit.si/nixpkgs-architecture53 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
27 Mar 2023
@nbp:mozilla.orgnbpIf you do not plan on solving constraints, then you are going to have assertions or conflicting configuration which are left to the user to resolve.17:19:23
29 Mar 2023
@adrielus:matrix.orgprescientmoon joined the room.13:25:50
@snowytrees:matrix.orgsnowytrees Reading nbp 's comment (https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/3#issuecomment-370151582) in the RFC after eelco introduced his configurations idea (https://gist.github.com/edolstra/29ce9d8ea399b703a7023073b0dbc00d) cleared up a lot for me how you can build on SOS. Dropping the link because it was pretty deep in the comments 15:22:36
2 Apr 2023
@noob_tea:matrix.orgteaHas something like doing nixpkgs-review on github actions been tried out yet?14:41:59
@noob_tea:matrix.orgteawould speed up time to merge and complexity by a lot14:42:10
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossthere's nowhere near enough capacity, is there?14:42:28
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossi feel like somebody was talking about this in another room the other day 14:42:45
@noob_tea:matrix.orgtea
In reply to @qyliss:fairydust.space
there's nowhere near enough capacity, is there?
capacity =?
14:43:08
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rosswait it was you who was having this conversation14:43:25
@noob_tea:matrix.orgteawhere?14:44:08
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossin #tvl14:44:19
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Ross2023-03-2614:44:24
@noob_tea:matrix.orgteathis is for nixpkgs-review and not nixpkgs as a whole14:44:28
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossassuming you're tea|m14:44:28
@noob_tea:matrix.orgtea yes14:44:32
@noob_tea:matrix.orgteathere is a limit of 20 concurrent jobs which would get really jammed14:44:48
@noob_tea:matrix.orgteaso maybe we'd need to filter somehow14:44:55
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossyeah14:45:06
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossnixpkgs-review is often huge14:45:11
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossso it would be useful for the subset of packages that only have one or two things that depend on them14:46:08
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossbut I feel like there aren't very many of those?14:46:24
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossusually stuff doesn't have any dependents, or it has a bunch14:46:25
@k900:0upti.meK900It's a very bimodal distribution yeah 14:46:43
@k900:0upti.meK900It's either 1 or the entire world 14:46:49
@k900:0upti.meK900And very little in between 14:46:52
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossofborg takes care of the 1 case, and the staging process takes care of the entire world case14:47:08
@piegames:matrix.org@piegames:matrix.org
In reply to @k900:0upti.me
It's either 1 or the entire world
1, 2, many :)
14:47:51
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Ross(personally I don't find nixpkgs-review hugely useful anyway, because it doesn't tell you whether stuff was already broken before, so it needs a bunch of post-hoc investigation anyway)14:48:28
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossunless you get lucky and everything builds14:48:47
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rosshow much RAM do you get on GitHub actions?14:49:14

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9