!djTaTBQyWEPRQxrPTb:nixos.org

Nixpkgs Architecture Team

232 Members
https://github.com/nixpkgs-architecture, weekly public meetings on Wednesday 15:00-16:00 UTC at https://meet.jit.si/nixpkgs-architecture52 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
23 Mar 2023
@ckie:ckie.devmei 🌒& changed their display name from ckie (they/them; heavily limited keyboard usage, dictation or voice only) to ckie (they/them; limited keyboard usage, voice preferred).02:05:31
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius Hello to the NAT team, we encountered a case where two package = lib.mkDefault some-pkg on type = types.package cannot be mergeEqualOption because it's not implemented, any idea of the rationale of why? 15:59:20
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius cc Robert Hensing (roberth) infinisil 15:59:23
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil raitobezarius: I don't think that's relevant for the NAT, let's go to #dev:nixos.org 16:01:28
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilCross-link for future reference: https://matrix.to/#/!kjdutkOsheZdjqYmqp:nixos.org/$4JRUMCmXpqnOjcMUuayPc_jUXG5Epf_nMJz791BJ_3k?via=nixos.org&via=matrix.org&via=nixos.dev16:13:00
24 Mar 2023
@htran:matrix.orghtran joined the room.02:21:11
@niksnut:matrix.orgEelco joined the room.14:28:16
25 Mar 2023
@amardeeps:matrix.org@amardeeps:matrix.org joined the room.04:47:00
@mbdf:matrix.orgMaëlys Bras de fer joined the room.18:36:45
@bew:matrix.orgbewHello people :) I'm wondering if https://github.com/nix-community/noogle/issues/28 (the part about nixpkgs, structured documentation/metadata) could be a subject for the NAT team?23:39:41
@bew:matrix.orgbew * Hello people :) I'm wondering if https://github.com/nix-community/noogle/issues/28 (the part about nixpkgs: structured documentation/metadata for functions) ould be a subject for the NAT team?23:40:04
@bew:matrix.orgbew * Hello people :) I'm wondering if https://github.com/nix-community/noogle/issues/28 (the part about nixpkgs: structured documentation/metadata for functions) could be a subject for the NAT team?23:40:13
@figsoda:matrix.orgfigsodaThey are mostly under doc/language-frameworks, but the plugin stuff are more scattered23:47:24
26 Mar 2023
@rbutani:matrix.orgrbutani joined the room.00:27:03
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil bew: You might be interested in https://discourse.nixos.org/t/working-group-member-search-module-system-for-packages/26574 :) 07:55:05
@bew:matrix.orgbew Thanks infinisil I've been following that from a distance already (and it's really cool ✨) but I don't see how that's relevant to my issue..
Or are you suggesting my issue will kinda just disappear with this because there won't be builder functions anymore? 👀
11:45:29
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil
In reply to @bew:matrix.org
Thanks infinisil I've been following that from a distance already (and it's really cool ✨) but I don't see how that's relevant to my issue..
Or are you suggesting my issue will kinda just disappear with this because there won't be builder functions anymore? 👀
Yes, if that effort really succeeds, then all the builders will be in a searchable option manual, along with all their arguments and more :)
11:49:02
@whentze:matrix.orgWanja Hentzenew search.nixos.org tab for builder options when?11:50:02
@bew:matrix.orgbew
In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org
Yes, if that effort really succeeds, then all the builders will be in a searchable option manual, along with all their arguments and more :)
I see! That'll probably not be tomorrow though ^^ you don't think something like I suggest is worth doing as a quicker step?
11:59:22
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil
In reply to @bew:matrix.org
I see! That'll probably not be tomorrow though ^^ you don't think something like I suggest is worth doing as a quicker step?
Can you open an issue in https://github.com/nixpkgs-architecture/issues for that? While it's not something I'd like to focus on myself, we can definitely keep track of it there
12:03:58
@roberthensing:matrix.orgRobert Hensing (roberth)

This could probably be a project for the NAT (Nixpkgs Architecture Team) ?

I think the team should have a role coordinating projects across nixpkgs, and as a resource you can ask about the design of nixpkgs, but implementation work should be up to individuals, which may or may not be part of the team.

12:20:38
@roberthensing:matrix.orgRobert Hensing (roberth)We must not end up in a situation where all such work is delegated to a single team that doesn't have the capacity to act on the many ideas. If that were the case, we'd better disband the team, because the team would be counterproductive to its end goal.12:22:05
@jkachmar:matrix.org@jkachmar:matrix.org joined the room.16:05:51
@mbdf:matrix.orgMaëlys Bras de fer set a profile picture.17:20:00
27 Mar 2023
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil @room: The next meeting will take place in ~10 minutes - meeting link - live stream - meeting notes 14:25:26
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil * @room: The next meeting will take place in ~5 minutes - meeting link - live stream - meeting notes 14:25:32
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil tomberek: growpotkin ( Alex Ameen ): Another ping, joining? 14:32:48
@federicodschonborn:matrix.org@federicodschonborn:matrix.org joined the room.15:03:30
@tomberek:matrix.orgtomberekno, not today (traveling)15:15:32
@kha13d:matrix.orgkha13d joined the room.15:20:10

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9