| 22 Mar 2023 |
 Alyssa Ross | OfBorg already checks outputs, not files. | 11:43:23 |
| Alyssa Ross | It's annoying, because you have to manually ping people if your changes don't cause rebuilds. | 11:43:33 |
 Wanja Hentze | right, but codeowners style things don't | 11:43:44 |
| Wanja Hentze | so yeah probably something nixpkgs specific is needed | 11:43:59 |
| Alyssa Ross | or gerrit :P | 11:44:06 |
 snowytrees | Ah wasnt sure how ofborg works that makes sense. | 11:44:07 |
 @piegames:matrix.org | In reply to @qyliss:fairydust.space
OfBorg already checks outputs, not files. Oh, is this the reason why it won't ping people if a module with a maintainer is modified? | 11:44:25 |
| Wanja Hentze | ah, gerrit, all the ergonomics of emailing patches with all the openness and flexibility of github | 11:44:52 |
| @piegames:matrix.org | Same for tests IIRC, very annoying | 11:44:54 |
| Alyssa Ross | not sure | 11:44:59 |
| Wanja Hentze | okay that was a bit too harsh on gerrit maybe, but I'm not fond of it | 11:48:47 |
 tea | so what exactly needs to be written? | 12:21:17 |
| tea | given a commit, build the package in the title, check codeowners and then merge it via an action? | 12:22:10 |
| Wanja Hentze | ideally check for review by codeowner *and* CI | 12:23:09 |
| Wanja Hentze | but I think regular CI can already block merging on github | 12:23:41 |
 davidak | In reply to @qyliss:fairydust.space
davidak: then please don't do that again without asking the participants in this specific case i considered it public data because it's publicly available on youtube. they also create a transcript for subtitles and google probably also trains deep learning models with the data and might even sell it (to OpenAI). ChatGPT is of course no solution when the goal is to keep it private. i see 2 options for offline models, but they might take longer to reach the quality
do you think i should have asked before sending the data to OpenAI in this specific case? i will not do that again
| 13:16:21 |
| Alyssa Ross | To me, there's a distinction between something being publicly available (where it could be scraped or whatever), and it being actively sent somewhere. | 13:17:49 |
| Alyssa Ross | it's something that a lot of people seem to feel strongly about, so I think it's safer to ask | 13:19:49 |
| davidak | i see. thank you | 13:22:52 |
|  jurraca joined the room. | 14:05:29 |
 raitobezarius | In reply to @davidak:matrix.org
in this specific case i considered it public data because it's publicly available on youtube. they also create a transcript for subtitles and google probably also trains deep learning models with the data and might even sell it (to OpenAI). ChatGPT is of course no solution when the goal is to keep it private. i see 2 options for offline models, but they might take longer to reach the quality
do you think i should have asked before sending the data to OpenAI in this specific case? i will not do that again
alpaca.cpp / llama.cpp exist with an offline model, of course, it does not have GPT-4 performance | 14:37:29 |
| davidak | yes, i will try them as well | 15:01:29 |
 Sandro 🐧 | In reply to @whentze:matrix.org
ah, gerrit, all the ergonomics of emailing patches with all the openness and flexibility of github What ergonomics? Email based patch workflow has the worst UX. You need a compatible mail server, some cli mail program and configure that all correct. | 23:58:40 |
| Alyssa Ross | I think that's what they were saying | 23:59:14 |
| Wanja Hentze | I was doing a sarcasm | 23:59:18 |
| 23 Mar 2023 |
| Sandro 🐧 | glad we are on the same page | 00:02:59 |
|  mei 🌒& changed their display name from ckie (they/them; heavily limited keyboard usage, dictation or voice only) to ckie (they/them; limited keyboard usage, voice preferred). | 02:05:31 |
| raitobezarius | Hello to the NAT team, we encountered a case where two package = lib.mkDefault some-pkg on type = types.package cannot be mergeEqualOption because it's not implemented, any idea of the rationale of why? | 15:59:20 |
| raitobezarius | cc Robert Hensing (roberth) infinisil | 15:59:23 |
 infinisil | raitobezarius: I don't think that's relevant for the NAT, let's go to #dev:nixos.org | 16:01:28 |
