!djTaTBQyWEPRQxrPTb:nixos.org

Nixpkgs Architecture Team

228 Members
https://github.com/nixpkgs-architecture, weekly public meetings on Wednesday 15:00-16:00 UTC at https://meet.jit.si/nixpkgs-architecture53 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
5 Feb 2023
@blaggacao:matrix.org@blaggacao:matrix.org * I think to break the dam (of contributor market pull), a little bit of official push might be needed. But I also can't predict how easy it would be to mobilize and recruit future owners. 18:24:46
@blaggacao:matrix.org@blaggacao:matrix.org⚖️ a little bit of push & a little bit of pull to see what happens 🤷18:25:58
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilAh true, maybe for a start it could be mentioned in the weekly discourse meeting notes how people can help out18:27:21
@blaggacao:matrix.org@blaggacao:matrix.orgVery good idea, maybe coupled with a suggestion of strategic topics that the NAT has already in mind to help people match with their vocation. 🤷18:28:35
@blaggacao:matrix.org@blaggacao:matrix.org * Very good idea, maybe coupled with a suggestion of strategic topics that the NAT has already in mind to help people make match with their vocation. 🤷18:28:41
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil David Arnold (blaggacao): Honestly maybe that's how all RFC's should be done. Open an issue in the RFCs repository with an idea, have people nominate for working on the RFC together, once there's like 3 people, create a repository to develop it (RFC 138), requiring accepting reviews from each to change the repo. 18:32:58

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9