!djTaTBQyWEPRQxrPTb:nixos.org

Nixpkgs Architecture Team

233 Members
https://github.com/nixpkgs-architecture, weekly public meetings on Wednesday 15:00-16:00 UTC at https://meet.jit.si/nixpkgs-architecture51 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
23 Sep 2023
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilWell it's generic to any CI check really00:14:46
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil
In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org
This should be fairly non-controversial, so I'll go ahead with a Nixpkgs PR for this, indicating the slight deviation from the RFC
Only a draft for now: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/256792
00:43:49
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil Btw here's the RFC 140 milestone aggregating all of these issues/PRs 00:52:52
24 Sep 2023
@mib:kanp.aimib 🥐 joined the room.12:23:48
27 Sep 2023
@mib:kanp.aimib 🥐 changed their display name from mib to mib 🥐.05:53:09
@poweruser64:matrix.orgPowerUser64 joined the room.09:30:05
@poweruser64:matrix.orgPowerUser64After RFC 140 is being used, will packages still have categories of some sort? It seems like it would be a waste to get rid of all the work that has been done to classify 80000+ packages. Personally, I learn about a lot of software just by looking at what other packages are in the categories I use the most.09:33:14
@piegames:matrix.org@piegames:matrix.orgThere's a separate RFC for that09:33:55
@poweruser64:matrix.orgPowerUser64it's also nice when developing a package to be able to see examples of how similar software was packaged right in the same place09:34:00
@poweruser64:matrix.orgPowerUser64Ah good to know09:34:08
@poweruser64:matrix.orgPowerUser64What number is it?09:34:19
@poweruser64:matrix.orgPowerUser64 * After RFC 140 is in full effect, will packages still have categories of some sort? It seems like it would be a waste to get rid of all the work that has been done to classify 80000+ packages. Personally, I learn about a lot of software just by looking at what other packages are in the categories I use the most.09:35:51
@piegames:matrix.org@piegames:matrix.org156 I think?09:36:31
@poweruser64:matrix.orgPowerUser64hmm that one is "No Direct Nixpkgs Pushes"09:37:42
@poweruser64:matrix.orgPowerUser64do you know what it might be called?09:39:13
@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nlRick (Mindavi)meta.tags or categories or something 09:39:46
@poweruser64:matrix.orgPowerUser64I searched for categories and tags but got nothing 😕09:40:40
@poweruser64:matrix.orgPowerUser64ah! 14609:43:03
@poweruser64:matrix.orgPowerUser64https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/14609:43:04
@poweruser64:matrix.orgPowerUser64somehow searching for categories didn't find this?09:43:20
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil
In reply to @poweruser64:matrix.org
After RFC 140 is in full effect, will packages still have categories of some sort? It seems like it would be a waste to get rid of all the work that has been done to classify 80000+ packages. Personally, I learn about a lot of software just by looking at what other packages are in the categories I use the most.
We can always get that back from the commit history, though new packages won't have that anymore yeah
09:44:43
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilThe benefit of those categories is imo less significant that the benefit of improving the all-packages situation09:45:59

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9