| 17 Jul 2023 |
 infinisil | I'm totally fine speaking alone and just giving you a shout-out for co-author | 17:05:37 |
| infinisil | Ah I think I should definitely talk about it as the main author of the RFC and implementation :) | 17:06:04 |
 Ilan Joselevich (Kranzes) | Yeah I was just joking lol | 17:06:25 |
| infinisil | In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org
Robert Hensing (roberth): As co-author of the RFC and someone very involved in reviewing the implementation, do you want to do the talk together, with you as co-speaker? I wrote a draft proposal here, anybody is free to give feedback before I submit it: https://talks.nixcon.org/nixcon-2023/talk/review/XYQDYDZ3AQDUGXJAH8ZBRY93HAQ7YYWG | 17:08:06 |
| infinisil | Especially not sure about the title :) | 17:08:33 |
 Robert Hensing (roberth) | ✂️ | 17:12:54 |
| infinisil | 🪨 | 17:26:16 |
| infinisil | Guess it's settled then! | 17:26:22 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | brainstorming.
all-packages.nix is dead, long live package.nix | 17:30:43 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | ok, more like a brain breeze on my end actually | 17:32:19 |
| infinisil | I guess this highlights arguably the most controversial aspect of the RFC, not sure if that's a good thing | 17:33:47 |
| infinisil | But I like this suggestion more than what I had, 🤔 | 17:34:47 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | The title can be provocative | 17:35:10 |
| infinisil |
all-packages.nix? More like some-packages.nix!
| 17:35:21 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | Stop package discrimination now! | 17:36:34 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | too much? too much. | 17:36:52 |
 growpotkin1 | pfunk.nix | 17:37:03 |
| infinisil |
not-all-packages-anymore.nix
| 17:38:00 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | Not all-packages.nix? Never was. | 17:38:33 |
| Ilan Joselevich (Kranzes) | I doubt you can come up with an good and funny title for such a boring (but very important!!!) RFC | 17:38:35 |
| infinisil | I think we've been doing pretty good tbh! | 17:38:54 |
