| 26 Mar 2024 |
 Philip Taron (UTC-8) | ✅ because of 🟥 | 21:01:06 |
 willbush | Is it possible to get comments that were made on past https://meet.jit.si/nixpkgs-architecture jit.si meets? I wanted to look at some of the links, but forgot to save them. | 22:44:11 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | Just ping me if I dropped one of them, I got a passel load of bookmarks | 23:20:46 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | https://docs.rs/miette/latest/miette/ | 23:20:56 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | https://blog.robenkleene.com/2023/12/26/introducing-rep-ren/ | 23:23:51 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | The idea is to emit something suggestions in a way that can be automatically applied by some tool (perhaps rep) | 23:24:31 |
| willbush | Thanks! | 23:28:17 |
| 27 Mar 2024 |
|  @admin:nixos.org joined the room. | 13:50:43 |
| @admin:nixos.org left the room. | 13:50:53 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | The term I couldn't come up with yesterday was codemod (see for instance https://github.com/nix-community/docnix/tree/main/codemod) | 15:59:15 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | Others: https://ast-grep.github.io/ | 18:48:26 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | And https://comby.dev/ | 18:58:19 |
| 29 Mar 2024 |
|  SebTM joined the room. | 04:24:35 |
| 31 Mar 2024 |
 @federicodschonborn:matrix.org | Not sure if this is the correct place to ask but I have noticed that the by-name check runs even when only adding new comments to the PR, does it really need to? | 01:02:53 |
| @federicodschonborn:matrix.org | * Not sure if this is the correct place to ask but I have noticed that the by-name check runs even when only adding new comments to a PR, does it really need to? | 01:03:06 |
| @federicodschonborn:matrix.org | Or at least the loading indicator is active, I'm not sure if it is actually running | 01:04:31 |
| @federicodschonborn:matrix.org | * Or at least the loading indicator shows up, I'm not sure if it is actually running | 01:04:39 |
 infinisil | Federico Damián Schonborn See https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/fd387e61dbd83166bc872af87e433166f42fd25b/.github/workflows/check-by-name.yml#L10-L16
I don't think adding comments should trigger it | 14:43:11 |
| 1 Apr 2024 |
| infinisil | No office hour today! | 14:49:18 |
| 3 Apr 2024 |
|  gerrt joined the room. | 18:07:08 |
|  @phileas:asra.gr joined the room. | 22:41:25 |
| 4 Apr 2024 |
|  @stablejoy:matrix.org joined the room. | 06:10:10 |
|  fabaff changed their display name from Fabian Affolter to fabaff. | 08:40:40 |
 @adam:robins.wtf | pardon if this was addressed in the by-name RFC, but was it every considered to have a packages.nix that could allow by-name to support multiple packages in a single directory? i'm still thinking over multi package support | 15:25:02 |
| infinisil | adamcstephens 🐝: Considered yes, but not thought out. Rather deferred for the future to keep it as small as possible for now | 15:31:59 |
| 5 Apr 2024 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | infinisil: what do you think about having a function.nix indicate that what ought to exist in the by-name directory is a function, not a derivation? | 16:00:02 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | * infinisil: what do you think about having a file named function.nix indicate that what ought to exist in the by-name directory is a function, not a derivation? | 16:00:13 |
 @piegames:matrix.org | In reply to @philiptaron:matrix.org
infinisil: what do you think about having a file named function.nix indicate that what ought to exist in the by-name directory is a function, not a derivation? I think this was initially attempted by the RFC | 16:02:14 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | In reply to @piegames:matrix.org
I think this was initially attempted by the RFC I see https://github.com/nixpkgs-architecture/simple-package-paths/pull/34 which is where the restriction to just derivations is introduced, but I don't see a lot of justification for why nix-build -A name always builds is there. | 16:11:46 |
|  @yaqueen:matrix.org joined the room. | 20:35:04 |
