| 14 Jun 2023 |
 Robert Hensing (roberth) | oh, yeah. Nixpkgs should just fix name imo | 16:41:35 |
 John Ericson | fix name? | 16:41:45 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | I tried it when working on cleanAttrs, didn't break much | 16:41:56 |
| John Ericson | make it pname? | 16:41:57 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | make it just the package name | 16:41:59 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | yeah | 16:42:02 |
| John Ericson | what ends up being the derivation name? | 16:42:22 |
| John Ericson | name-version? | 16:42:23 |
| John Ericson | * name + "-" + version? | 16:42:34 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | exactly. It matches the store path name part | 16:42:48 |
 hexa | 
Download image.png | 16:43:00 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | because that's what builtins.derviation cares about | 16:43:07 |
| hexa | as long as this situation would get fixed along the way I'll take it | 16:43:17 |
| hexa | the first package is actually called solanum, the second package is some gnome extension in some namespace | 16:43:41 |
| hexa | but yeah, silly pname parsing | 16:43:50 |
