| 24 Jan 2023 |
 Pol | Indeed. | 13:26:40 |
| Pol | The build process needs to be open... and it is not currently. | 13:26:54 |
| Pol | Done: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/212296#pullrequestreview-1267860968 | 16:50:01 |
| Pol | It would be nice if you could chime in guys | 16:50:10 |
| 25 Jan 2023 |
|  @grahamc:nixos.orgchanged room power levels. | 14:44:45 |
| Pol | 🙄 | 14:54:57 |
| 26 Jan 2023 |
| Pol | Hey, I was wondering how we could provide PHPActor (https://github.com/phpactor/phpactor) in Nix. | 08:38:24 |
| Pol | There is no PHAR available | 08:38:32 |
| Pol | What would be the best option if we want to provide PHPActor independently ? | 08:39:26 |
| Pol | I found a workaround :D https://github.com/phpactor/phpactor/issues/26#issuecomment-1404721481 | 09:08:20 |
| Pol | By the way, it would be nice to review this PR! https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/212296 | 09:14:50 |
| Pol | It's merged, thanks etu ! | 18:42:20 |
| 28 Jan 2023 |
| Pol | tgerbet: Thanks for this !!!! https://github.com/LeSuisse/shelly-ht-action-prometheus I'm planning to set it up today on my raspberry router :) | 08:32:33 |
| Pol | There is also this one: https://github.com/aexel90/shelly_exporter | 10:51:17 |
| Pol | Which might be easier to setup for me | 10:51:24 |
| Pol | Sadly the second one doesn't work: https://github.com/aexel90/shelly_exporter/issues/3 | 11:16:03 |
 tgerbet | I implemented it using the action calls to not have to rely on their cloud SaaS in my home infra.
Different tradeoffs between the 2 I guess :) | 11:18:15 |
| Pol | Yes indeed, I don't have a mqtt server so, the second one might be a better option for me | 11:19:26 |
| tgerbet | No need for a MQTT broker in both cases I think.
In my situation you have to add an action call in the sensor configuration. When the sensor wakes up it sends a POST request against the URL. The service listens to that and exposes the ingested data in the format Prometheus expects | 11:25:44 |
| Pol | Oh I might try then. | 11:35:57 |
| 30 Jan 2023 |
| Pol | tgerbet: I submitted a PR for the second project... feel free to give a review: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/213534 | 12:54:34 |
| Pol | tgerbet: How to add the test in there ^^ ? | 19:15:39 |
| Pol | tgerbet: How do you run the test of this new module? | 21:22:00 |
| 5 Feb 2023 |
| Pol | Can we have a look at : https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/214034 | 19:20:25 |
| 6 Feb 2023 |
| Pol | Thanks etu ^^ The backport is ready as well: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/214885 | 10:06:45 |
| Pol | ma27: These failures are unpredictable and related to the tests. I can't personally do anything about them. | 10:07:11 |
 ma27 | Can't we skip them (on Darwin at least)? | 10:07:31 |
| Pol | I don't know, maybe we should ask etu or Jan Tojnar about that. | 10:08:42 |
 @etu:failar.nu | I guess we could yes | 10:34:50 |
| tgerbet | I checked the logs to compare with the previous bumps (https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/208928) and it looks like it is mostly the same tests that fail:
Blacklist (with glob, quote and comments) [tests/blacklist.phpt]
Bug #66338 (Optimization binding of class constants is not safely opcacheable) [tests/bug66338.phpt]
Bug #78106: Path resolution fails if opcache disabled during request [tests/bug78106.phpt]
ISSUE #115 (path issue when using phar) [tests/issue0115.phpt]
ISSUE #149 (Phar mount points not working this OPcache enabled) [tests/issue0149.phpt]
revalidate_path 01: OPCache must cache only resolved real paths when revalidate_path is set [tests/revalidate_path_01.phpt]
| 10:38:05 |
