| 17 Feb 2024 |
 lassulus | pff | 04:56:34 |
 matthewcroughan | it works, undeniably | 04:56:41 |
| matthewcroughan | but still would be good to know where it is being used | 04:56:56 |
| matthewcroughan | In reply to @lassulus:lassul.us
but hybrid gpt/mbr is only useful if you bootloader doesn't support gpt. and there is a fallback to mbr. but if uboot supports efi than it doesn't need to care for the mbr stuff? the raspberry pi has boot firmware that only supports loading from mbr fat32, bootcode.bin must reside there | 04:57:21 |
| lassulus | it should work with 512m in the vm | 04:57:24 |
| matthewcroughan | In reply to @lassulus:lassul.us
it should work with 512m in the vm yeah and I'm saying that tests that fail with 512M without zram, succeed with zram | 04:58:13 |
| matthewcroughan | which makes me question why we don't just enable zram generally in all VMs | 04:58:27 |
| lassulus | that sounds like a bug | 04:58:30 |
| matthewcroughan | well yeah, it's not good to mask issues, but it made me wonder how it could also improve performance | 04:58:47 |
| matthewcroughan | would a test that never fails, but reports used memory in the VM be a useful thing? | 05:00:19 |
| matthewcroughan | do we have a test that reports information and does not fail right now? | 05:00:47 |
| lassulus | not yet | 05:01:09 |
| matthewcroughan | maybe I should make a test that fails if the VM ever consumes more than 512 instead | 05:01:18 |
| matthewcroughan | Are there not tests already failing like this? | 05:01:36 |
| lassulus | well first it would be nice to profile the build and see what consumes the memory | 05:01:41 |
| lassulus | the tests seem to work | 05:01:49 |
| lassulus | with the default amount of memory | 05:01:54 |
| matthewcroughan | Yeah I think it was something I did that caused it, hmm | 05:02:01 |
| 18 Feb 2024 |
|  hxr404 ✨ [it/she] changed their display name from hxr404 ✨ (they/them) to hxr404 ✨ [they/them] (offline). | 00:19:33 |
| hxr404 ✨ [it/she] | Heyy :3
Is it somehow possible to set up bind mounts via disko?
I tried
nodev = {
"/nix/store" = {
fsType = "tmpfs";
device = "/data/local/nix/store";
mountOptions = [ "bind" ];
};
}
doesn't throw an error, but also sadly doesn't do anything :(
| 00:36:34 |
| hxr404 ✨ [it/she] | * Heyy :3
Is it somehow possible to set up bind mounts via disko?
I tried
nodev = {
"/nix/store" = {
fsType = "tmpfs";
device = "/data/local/nix/store";
mountOptions = [ "bind" ];
};
};
doesn't throw an error, but also sadly doesn't do anything :(
| 00:37:08 |
| hxr404 ✨ [it/she] | * Heyy :3
Is it somehow possible to set up bind mounts via disko?
I tried
disko.devices.nodev = {
"/nix/store" = {
fsType = "tmpfs";
device = "/data/local/nix/store";
mountOptions = [ "bind" ];
};
};
doesn't throw an error, but also sadly doesn't do anything :(
| 00:40:42 |
| lassulus |
usually bind mounts are just managed with fileSystems.${target} = { device = src; options = [ "bind" ]; }; | 01:55:05 |
| lassulus | But if you need them for installation you need to mount them in a hook manually | 01:56:01 |
| hxr404 ✨ [it/she] | thanks a lot! <3
grepped through the _documentation as code_™, found the hooks options (didn't know it exists), this exactly what I needed yay \o/ | 02:17:51 |
| hxr404 ✨ [it/she] | * thanks a lot! <3
grepped through the _documentation as code_™, found the hooks options (didn't know it exists), this exactly what I needed yay \o/ | 02:18:03 |
| hxr404 ✨ [it/she] | quick follow-up question:
How would I get the root mount point inside a hook? Don't want to hardcode /mnt | 02:48:16 |
| 23 Feb 2024 |
|  @5m5z3q888q5prxkg:chat.lightnovel-dungeon.de changed their profile picture. | 03:28:34 |
| 22 Feb 2024 |
|  Gaétan Lepage joined the room. | 16:39:51 |
| 23 Feb 2024 |
|  Ryan Yin joined the room. | 05:47:35 |
