9 Sep 2024 |
| Pandapip1 joined the room. | 03:44:41 |
arjan5 | In reply to @lassulus:lassul.us If you send me your config as a flake I can take a look. But I guess it's a problem of the double eval the VM tests do Thanks again! I've made a relatively small flake to reproduce this issue with, and put it in an issue for easier tracking and future discoverability: https://github.com/nix-community/disko/issues/763 | 07:37:22 |
Tumble | Is the default config of zfs on disko the one where up to 1 drive can fail and i can replace it? | 15:48:57 |
Tumble | Or is it by default striped with no redundancies? | 15:56:00 |
zerox | See: https://github.com/nix-community/disko/blob/master/example/zfs-with-vdevs.nix
You can remove cache & special sections. | 15:56:02 |
Tumble | Redacted or Malformed Event | 18:08:28 |
Tumble | In reply to @zerox:guix.uz See: https://github.com/nix-community/disko/blob/master/example/zfs-with-vdevs.nix
You can remove cache & special sections. Remove? | 18:08:42 |
Tumble | I want cache | 18:08:48 |
zerox | Tumble: in case if you don't need cache, you can remove it, otherwise you need another device for cache. | 18:09:43 |
Tumble | https://git.disroot.org/tumble/linux-config/src/branch/nixos/nixos/onyx/disko.nix How to edit this to have it be raidz1 | 18:09:48 |
Tumble | In reply to @zerox:guix.uz Tumble: in case if you don't need cache, you can remove it, otherwise you need another device for cache. I have a device for cache | 18:10:00 |
Tumble | This works to make a zfs pool with a cache drive but I don't think it has any redundancy | 18:10:42 |
zerox | Tumble: for redundancy, add mode= ... . | 18:11:21 |
Tumble | raidz1? | 18:12:06 |
zerox | Tumble: yes, it can be raidz1. See: https://github.com/nix-community/disko/blob/master/lib/types/zpool.nix#L4 | 18:13:29 |
Tumble | Does a disko options site exist? | 19:32:12 |
Tumble | What's raidz? | 19:34:25 |
Tumble | Without number | 19:34:33 |
Tumble | Is z1 where I can loose one drive? | 19:34:46 |
10 Sep 2024 |
Tumble | In reply to @zerox:guix.uz Tumble: yes, it can be raidz1. See: https://github.com/nix-community/disko/blob/master/lib/types/zpool.nix#L4 Because I have zfs housing my /home and /var will I have to rebuild the whole install? | 00:30:39 |
Tumble | I'm ok with that anyway because I've only just done that 10 hours ago | 00:31:09 |
colemickens | Is it possible to specify a disko image partition whose contents are... a uboot build output, for example? | 02:56:44 |
colemickens | weird. | 04:57:50 |
colemickens | I'm trying to build diskoImagesScript on the aarch64 box for a hostPlatform.system = "aarch64-linux" machine and it's complaining that it wants an x86_64-linux builder for a qemu run-vm dep | 04:58:33 |
colemickens | even weirder, it's a dep of an aarch64 output? | 05:00:54 |
colemickens | /nix/store/giwwj37z3bv7zcd9np4h1475gv6v723x-h96maxv58-disko-images.drv
└───/nix/store/icdy400c78p77dmg953x9n0s9cd51x81-h96maxv58-disko-images.drv
└───/nix/store/mw0b87v5jir4lv9qk50h3dahqznqicmc-vm-run.drv
└───/nix/store/3sc1kz031fhjq0m6lk0dd96zb23c9jck-qemu-host-cpu-only-9.1.0.drv
└───/nix/store/wgyx5ghqdsy6zjr2f43bd1k53mbryiki-mesa-aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-24.2.0.drv
└───/nix/store/wzab9w8ak2mafl1gxwi811lbc7pyjcgl-source.drv
| 05:00:57 |
colemickens | error: a 'x86_64-linux' with features {} is required to build '/nix/store/wzab9w8ak2mafl1gxwi811lbc7pyjcgl-source.drv', but I am a 'aarch64-linux' with features {benchmark, big-parallel, gccarch-armv8-a, kvm, nixos-test}
| 05:01:13 |
colemickens | odd, odd, odd. | 05:01:17 |
colemickens | "aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu" looks like cross-comp but idk why | 05:02:10 |
colemickens | I'm looking at how imageBuilderPkgs is defaulted/used and how host/buildPlatform are set for the system that includes this module and it seems like everything should be fine | 05:07:38 |