Sender | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
11 Aug 2024 | ||
matthewcroughan | I'm unable to perform a nixos-install for an arm64 target, odd | 19:45:59 |
matthewcroughan | *
| 19:46:06 |
matthewcroughan | /nix/store/ydg6krk7waimsm36njvkv4g0xchq3iry-nixos-install-tools-24.11pre-git/bin/nixos-install --no-root-password --option substituters "" --no-channel-copy --system /nix/store/1p8v7jgaglnk0k6vkjmx0lsjwd3a8vdp-nixos-system-homerouter-24.11.20240731.9f918d6 | 19:46:18 |
matthewcroughan |
| 19:46:57 |
matthewcroughan | *
| 19:47:01 |
matthewcroughan | Ah, nixos-enter doesn't work unless there's a profile there first | 19:47:51 |
blimbus joined the room. | 23:19:36 | |
12 Aug 2024 | ||
BMG | Is there a way of running disko in a vm test? I'm trying it with just disko --mode disko ... but it's reaching out to the internet and failing | 14:36:14 |
BMG | I'll have a play around with diskoLib.testLib.makeDiskoTest | 14:37:53 |
BMG | Yeah, Disko's testLib was the way to go. Had to import it a bit differently due to the impure <nixpkgs> defaults for some of it's args, but no biggy. | 16:00:17 |
matthewcroughan | BMG: if you have imported Disko into a nixosConfiguration, then a VM Test is already present for that in system.build.toplevel.installTest | 16:02:13 |
BMG | In reply to @matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itGood to know. makeDiskoTest is a better fit for use case in this instance https://github.com/numtide/nixos-facter/pull/73 | 16:05:12 |
BMG | https://github.com/numtide/nixos-facter/pull/73/files#diff-35d68d8d6463519724b4aef23da56f8e50797dc42899592a9003ecb7c475cddc | 16:05:31 |
𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒗𝒊𝒓 joined the room. | 17:10:12 | |
13 Aug 2024 | ||
SigmaSquadron | Redacted or Malformed Event | 22:06:55 |
SigmaSquadron | Redacted or Malformed Event | 22:07:28 |
14 Aug 2024 | ||
·☽•Nameless☆•777 · ± joined the room. | 08:57:07 | |
matthewcroughan | I can confirm the issue with nixos-install running out of memory still happens even with the latest disko and nix tooilng
| 17:58:10 |
matthewcroughan | All that can really be done in this scenario is trying again until it works | 17:58:30 |
matthewcroughan | It doesn't happen every time | 17:58:38 |
SigmaSquadron | Hi all. Is there a way to ensure a certain disk is processed first in a disko configuration? I have a detached-header LUKS setup that encrypts my internal disks and writes their headers to an USB device. Disko does encrypt both devices, but it processes the USB last, and it does so by deleting the headers and repartitioning. Is there a way to ensure it formats the USB before installing the headers? | 21:06:50 |
SigmaSquadron | * Sorry, I was looking for the priority option. | 21:12:26 |
SigmaSquadron | * Hi all. Is there a way to ensure a certain disk is processed first in a disko configuration? I have a detached-header LUKS setup that encrypts my internal disks and writes their headers to an USB device. Disko does encrypt both devices, but it processes the USB last, and it does so by deleting the headers and repartitioning. Is there a way to ensure it formats the USB before installing the headers?
| 21:20:39 |
SigmaSquadron | * Hi all. Is there a way to ensure a certain disk is processed first in a disko configuration? I have a detached-header LUKS setup that encrypts my internal disks and writes their headers to an USB device. Disko does encrypt both devices, but it processes the USB last, and it does so by deleting the headers and repartitioning. Is there a way to ensure it formats the USB before installing the headers?
| 21:20:49 |
SigmaSquadron | So, the priority option doesn't seem to reorder disk partitioning, only the partition creation order. | 21:22:24 |
SigmaSquadron | actually, it might not be a partitioning issue, just some disk weirdness: | 21:50:31 |
SigmaSquadron | Download IMG_0596.png | 21:50:41 |
SigmaSquadron | i'm using this disko configuration: | 21:55:12 |
SigmaSquadron | Download partitioning.nix | 21:55:18 |
SigmaSquadron | Something is up with | 22:20:47 |