| 7 Apr 2024 |
n3v3r_a9a1n | [root@nixos:~]# ls /mnt/
home log nix persist root swap
[root@nixos:~]# ls /mnt/root
bin boot dev etc home lib lib64 nix persist proc root run srv sys tmp usr var
[root@nixos:~]# btrfs subvolume list /mnt
ID 256 gen 29 top level 5 path home
ID 257 gen 33 top level 5 path log
ID 258 gen 33 top level 5 path nix
ID 259 gen 29 top level 5 path persist
ID 260 gen 36 top level 5 path root
ID 261 gen 18 top level 5 path swap
ID 262 gen 29 top level 260 path root/srv
ID 263 gen 30 top level 260 path root/var/lib/portables
ID 264 gen 31 top level 260 path root/var/lib/machines
ID 265 gen 33 top level 260 path root/var/tmp
| 10:47:53 |
n3v3r_a9a1n | In reply to @xxxcrow:matrix.org then mount /dev/mapper/nvme-crypt /mnt or i shouldn't do it at all? | 10:50:02 |
lassulus | Perchun Pak: I created this PR to fix the gpt behaviour: https://github.com/nix-community/disko/pull/595 | 10:51:22 |
n3v3r_a9a1n | In reply to @xxxcrow:matrix.org or i shouldn't do it at all? if i mount the way tutorials on impermanence+btrfs say, everything looks fine,but how do i take the snapshot | 10:54:15 |
n3v3r_a9a1n | In reply to @perchun:matrix.org Vimjoyer did config for btrfs + impermanence, don't know about other things https://youtu.be/YPKwkWtK7l0?feature=shared also, sorry if it's not true, but i think the way way he implements everything is not really ok 1st. https://discourse.nixos.org/t/what-does-impermanence-add-over-built-in-functionality/27939/16 2nd. it doesn't work with some stuff (can't remember what exactly either lanzaboote, or clevis, or something like that) 3rd. something else i forgot exactly what | 11:22:11 |
@perchun:matrix.org | In reply to @xxxcrow:matrix.org also, sorry if it's not true, but i think the way way he implements everything is not really ok 1st. https://discourse.nixos.org/t/what-does-impermanence-add-over-built-in-functionality/27939/16 2nd. it doesn't work with some stuff (can't remember what exactly either lanzaboote, or clevis, or something like that) 3rd. something else i forgot exactly what Yeah, it deleted all of my data if there wasn't something correct in the setup. Like no /persist/system or wrong permissions on /persist/home (in second scenario, home manager just failed to start completely). Though it is probably the fault of impermanence.
But for now, it works on my machine™. Feel free to send your final setup, I will happily steal it ;) | 11:57:22 |
lassulus | whoops, I accidently ran sgdisk -o isntead -p on my main disk :D | 12:52:35 |
lassulus | luckily I could recover it with disko | 12:52:46 |
lassulus | but why are those 2 parameters (-p pronts, -o wipes) so close together on the keyboard :D | 12:53:07 |
lassulus | * but why are those 2 parameters (-p prints, -o wipes) so close together on the keyboard :D | 12:53:14 |
n3v3r_a9a1n | Quick questiono about disko and nixos-anywhere! How do I skip disko in nixos-anywhere? | 16:01:36 |
lassulus | Hmm you can't really. Maybe we should add a --stop-after-kexec parameter | 16:29:37 |
| 8 Apr 2024 |
| l0b0 joined the room. | 00:55:29 |
| @palo:xaos.space changed their display name from palo to palo moved to @mrvandalo:terranix.org. | 13:03:24 |
| palo joined the room. | 13:06:37 |
| @palo:xaos.space left the room. | 13:06:51 |
| palo changed their display name from mrvandalo to palo. | 13:12:45 |
n3v3r_a9a1n | is disko working with clevis??
error:
… while evaluating attribute 'nodes'
at «string»:4:25:
3| (deploy // {
4| nodes = {
| ^
5| inherit (deploy.nodes) "immortal";
… while evaluating attribute 'immortal'
at «string»:5:49:
4| nodes = {
5| inherit (deploy.nodes) "immortal";
| ^
6| };
(stack trace truncated; use '--show-trace' to show the full trace)
error:
Failed assertions:
- No filesystem or LUKS device with the name /dev/disk/by-uuid/9119a486-5702-4af7-bce8-5bb7e513ea6f is declared in your configuration.
- No filesystem or LUKS device with the name /dev/disk/by-uuid/e85aa7c5-5926-434c-8142-0ede397a6369 is declared in your configuration.
🚀 ❌ [deploy] [ERROR] Failed to evaluate deployment data: Evaluation resulted in a bad exit code: Some(1)
| 15:07:54 |
@perchun:matrix.org | afaik, disko doesn't use uuids to manage paritions, but labels
~ ❯ ls /dev/disk/by-partlabel/
disk-main-ESP
disk-main-luks
disk-main-swap
| 15:13:19 |
@perchun:matrix.org | In reply to @perchun:matrix.org
afaik, disko doesn't use uuids to manage paritions, but labels
~ ❯ ls /dev/disk/by-partlabel/
disk-main-ESP
disk-main-luks
disk-main-swap
or i should probably say "doesn't use uuids to reference partitions" | 15:13:51 |
lassulus | not sure if we can precalculate the UUIDs somehow, but afaik they are randomly generated | 15:13:53 |
lassulus | I guess we could override them with some hash if we really wanted to | 15:14:11 |
n3v3r_a9a1n | same for partlabel:
warning: Git tree '/home/egor/my-little-flake' is dirty
error:
… while evaluating attribute 'nodes'
at «string»:4:25:
3| (deploy // {
4| nodes = {
| ^
5| inherit (deploy.nodes) "immortal";
… while evaluating attribute 'immortal'
at «string»:5:49:
4| nodes = {
5| inherit (deploy.nodes) "immortal";
| ^
6| };
(stack trace truncated; use '--show-trace' to show the full trace)
error:
Failed assertions:
- No filesystem or LUKS device with the name /dev/disk/by-partlabel/disk-nvme0n1-luks is declared in your configuration.
- No filesystem or LUKS device with the name /dev/disk/by-partlabel/disk-sda-luks is declared in your configuration.
🚀 ❌ [deploy] [ERROR] Failed to evaluate deployment data: Evaluation resulted in a bad exit code: Some(1)
| 15:17:54 |
n3v3r_a9a1n | In reply to @xxxcrow:matrix.org
same for partlabel:
warning: Git tree '/home/egor/my-little-flake' is dirty
error:
… while evaluating attribute 'nodes'
at «string»:4:25:
3| (deploy // {
4| nodes = {
| ^
5| inherit (deploy.nodes) "immortal";
… while evaluating attribute 'immortal'
at «string»:5:49:
4| nodes = {
5| inherit (deploy.nodes) "immortal";
| ^
6| };
(stack trace truncated; use '--show-trace' to show the full trace)
error:
Failed assertions:
- No filesystem or LUKS device with the name /dev/disk/by-partlabel/disk-nvme0n1-luks is declared in your configuration.
- No filesystem or LUKS device with the name /dev/disk/by-partlabel/disk-sda-luks is declared in your configuration.
🚀 ❌ [deploy] [ERROR] Failed to evaluate deployment data: Evaluation resulted in a bad exit code: Some(1)
Solved with boot.initrd.luks.devices | 15:26:01 |
| @lychee:lefishe.club changed their display name from lychee to kay. | 17:11:04 |
| 9 Apr 2024 |
matthewcroughan @fosdem | lassulus: just wondering, have you seen the systemd-repart stuff in nixos? | 16:24:18 |
matthewcroughan @fosdem | https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/unstable/#sec-image-repart | 16:24:36 |
matthewcroughan @fosdem | it is just super fancy | 16:24:45 |
lassulus | Yes | 16:24:49 |
matthewcroughan @fosdem | If you had to compare it in terms of feature parity to disko, what would you say? | 16:25:16 |