| 24 Nov 2024 |
 elikoga | It was great! Thank you to everyone attending and organizing for making this a fun and productive weekend ❄️ | 22:55:55 |
| 25 Nov 2024 |
 fricklerhandwerk | It was a awesome seeing all of you (again), thanks everyone for coming! You made this the greatest Zürich ZHF hackathon ever.
I hope each of you could derive some pleasure from the event and take something away. Would love to keep up that spirit in May! | 07:18:28 |
| fricklerhandwerk | * It was a awesome seeing all of you (again), thanks everyone for coming! You made this the greatest Zürich ZHF hackathon ever.
I hope each of you could derive some pleasure from the event and take something away — I sure did. Would love to keep up that spirit in May! | 07:18:54 |
| fricklerhandwerk | Thanks a lot ners and john-rodewald for making all of this possible, and thanks to das-g for your invaluable support with the location. | 07:20:04 |
 nebucatnetzer13 | I absolutely agree, it is getting better every time.
Loved the group dinner 💪. | 08:21:23 |
 Corsin Pfister | This was my first time at ZHF, and I had a great time! Cool group of people! I really enjoyed seeing with how much fun and enthusiasm this was organized and put together. I'd like to thank ners , john-rodewald , das-g and everyone else who helped organizing this event! The group dinner was also a highlight for me 🙂 | 08:27:49 |
| fricklerhandwerk changed the room topic to "https://zurich.nix.ug/ - Next ZHF event 23-24 November 2024
Report notes: https://pad.lassul.us/dAqTN5maSqCRcvHuSun-Xg#" from "https://zurich.nix.ug/ - Next ZHF event 23-24 November 2024". | 09:18:46 |
| fricklerhandwerk | Hey all, I'd like to whip up a report to let others know what we've been up to. If you like to share you worked on, please do so here until this week Friday 2024-11-29:
https://pad.lassul.us/dAqTN5maSqCRcvHuSun-Xg#
One or two sentences is enough. Links and pictures would be great! | 09:22:08 |
| fricklerhandwerk | * Hey all, I'd like to whip up a report to let others know what we've been up to. If you like to share what you worked on, please do so here until this week Friday 2024-11-29:
https://pad.lassul.us/dAqTN5maSqCRcvHuSun-Xg#
One or two sentences is enough. Links and pictures would be great! | 09:22:18 |
 ners | @room ping to help spread the word | 09:53:35 |
| ners | I‘ll send out a request for feedback later today or tomorrow. | 09:57:38 |
 matthewcroughan | 
Download IMG_20241125_171930.jpg | 17:20:47 |
| matthewcroughan | @ners:nixos.dev !!! | 17:20:51 |
| 26 Nov 2024 |
 Koen de Jonge (SynQ) | When I upgrade my system from nixos-24.05 to nixos-24.11 I get this:
building Nix...
building the system configuration...
error:
… while calling the 'head' builtin
at /nix/var/nix/profiles/per-user/root/channels/nixos/lib/attrsets.nix:1:35741:
… while evaluating the attribute 'value'
at /nix/var/nix/profiles/per-user/root/channels/nixos/lib/modules.nix:1:33591:
… while evaluating the option `system.build.toplevel':
… while evaluating definitions from `/nix/var/nix/profiles/per-user/root/channels/nixos/nixos/modules/system/activation/top-level.nix':
(stack trace truncated; use '--show-trace' to show the full, detailed trace)
error:
Failed assertions:
- The option definition `sound' in `/etc/nixos/configuration.nix' no longer has any effect; please remove it.
The option was heavily overloaded and can be removed from most configurations.
Is there any way we can make this a bit more 'user friendly'?
| 11:35:15 |
| Koen de Jonge (SynQ) | * When I upgrade my system from nixos-24.05 to nixos-24.11 I get this:
building Nix...
building the system configuration...
error:
… while calling the 'head' builtin
at /nix/var/nix/profiles/per-user/root/channels/nixos/lib/attrsets.nix:1:35741:
… while evaluating the attribute 'value'
at /nix/var/nix/profiles/per-user/root/channels/nixos/lib/modules.nix:1:33591:
… while evaluating the option `system.build.toplevel':
… while evaluating definitions from `/nix/var/nix/profiles/per-user/root/channels/nixos/nixos/modules/system/activation/top-level.nix':
(stack trace truncated; use '--show-trace' to show the full, detailed trace)
error:
Failed assertions:
- The option definition `sound' in `/etc/nixos/configuration.nix' no longer has any effect; please remove it.
The option was heavily overloaded and can be removed from most configurations.
Is there any way we can make this a bit more 'user friendly'?
Also, how should I submit a ticket for this and at what location?
| 11:35:51 |
| Koen de Jonge (SynQ) | It is triggered by this entry in configuration.nix which comes as a default (in a previous install method):
# Enable sound.
sound.enable = true;
| 11:36:42 |
| elikoga | This is a combination of both nix errors being verbose in the wrong way And nixos evaluation assertions triggering overly verbose errors. If only the error message showed up with a reference to the definition, would that be a good behavior? | 11:36:53 |
| Koen de Jonge (SynQ) | I fear we will lose a few users of nixos over this. | 11:36:57 |
| Koen de Jonge (SynQ) | I would prefer that NixOS would just ignore the statement and throw a warning that it is depreciated. | 11:37:34 |
