!pbdtvoHxUGLhcEvnlu:nixos.org

Exotic Nix Targets

326 Members
103 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
7 Jul 2023
@lotte:chir.rs@lotte:chir.rs changed their profile picture.05:31:03
@fgaz:matrix.orgfgaz
In reply to @fgaz:matrix.org
sent an image.
https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-hardware/pull/662
19:34:35
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusRedacted or Malformed Event19:38:51
@alex:tunstall.xyzAlex
In reply to @fgaz:matrix.org
https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-hardware/pull/662

I'm currently compiling with a few patches applied to try to fix the compilation problems without disabling DRM, since I'd really like to get working HDMI on my VF2.

I'll share the configuration if I'm able to get it working. Given the similarities between the two SBCs (and their respective Linux fork), it might work for the Star64 too.

20:43:23
8 Jul 2023
@misuzu:matrix.orgmisuzu
In reply to @alex:tunstall.xyz

Has anyone worked out how to get the VF2 to run at 1.5GHz?

I'm using a kernel with the AXP15060 enabled and all the patches for PMIC and CPU freq applied, but the system still runs at 1GHz (the boot clock rate).

[nixos@nixos:/etc/nixos/nixos-vf2]$ sudo cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/cpuinfo_{cur,max}_freq
1000000
1500000
[nixos@nixos:/etc/nixos/nixos-vf2]$ sudo cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_{driver,governor,cur_freq}
cpufreq-dt
performance
1500000

It's even worse now, haha

% sudo grep '' /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/*
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/affected_cpus:0 1 2 3
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/cpuinfo_cur_freq:500000
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/cpuinfo_max_freq:1500000
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/cpuinfo_min_freq:375000
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/cpuinfo_transition_latency:4294967295
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/related_cpus:0 1 2 3
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_available_frequencies:375000 500000 750000 1500000
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_available_governors:performance schedutil
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_cur_freq:1500000
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_driver:cpufreq-dt
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_governor:performance
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_max_freq:1500000
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_min_freq:1500000
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_setspeed:<unsupported>
% uname -a
Linux nixos 6.4.0 #1-NixOS SMP Tue Jan  1 00:00:00 UTC 1980 riscv64 GNU/Linux
19:26:23
@alex:tunstall.xyzAlex
In reply to @misuzu:matrix.org

It's even worse now, haha

% sudo grep '' /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/*
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/affected_cpus:0 1 2 3
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/cpuinfo_cur_freq:500000
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/cpuinfo_max_freq:1500000
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/cpuinfo_min_freq:375000
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/cpuinfo_transition_latency:4294967295
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/related_cpus:0 1 2 3
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_available_frequencies:375000 500000 750000 1500000
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_available_governors:performance schedutil
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_cur_freq:1500000
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_driver:cpufreq-dt
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_governor:performance
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_max_freq:1500000
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_min_freq:1500000
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_setspeed:<unsupported>
% uname -a
Linux nixos 6.4.0 #1-NixOS SMP Tue Jan  1 00:00:00 UTC 1980 riscv64 GNU/Linux
I was on upstream 6.4.0 (from commit 4964ce0a869e) when I wrote that. I assume from your repository that this behaviour is from a build of e5a381c51d624ffd8784db908a58ae227d0608a4?
19:38:50
@misuzu:matrix.orgmisuzu
In reply to @alex:tunstall.xyz
I was on upstream 6.4.0 (from commit 4964ce0a869e) when I wrote that. I assume from your repository that this behaviour is from a build of e5a381c51d624ffd8784db908a58ae227d0608a4?
Yep. Though probably it's because of my non-vendor u-boot
19:41:11
@alex:tunstall.xyzAlexIt might not be a u-boot issue because when I booted the vendor's Debian image using the same u-boot I use for NixOS, it ran at 1.5 GHz. Or maybe you've run into a completely different problem with similar symptoms?19:42:46
@alex:tunstall.xyzAlexBy the way, the latest vendor u-boot is not flashable with the kernel from the upstream branch, because of the partition table in the DTB.19:44:42
@misuzu:matrix.orgmisuzu
In reply to @alex:tunstall.xyz
By the way, the latest vendor u-boot is not flashable with the kernel from the upstream branch, because of the partition table in the DTB.
That's likely a kernel issue, I've had no issues flashing latest firmware via recovery
19:48:11
@misuzu:matrix.orgmisuzu
In reply to @alex:tunstall.xyz
It might not be a u-boot issue because when I booted the vendor's Debian image using the same u-boot I use for NixOS, it ran at 1.5 GHz. Or maybe you've run into a completely different problem with similar symptoms?
That's just a hunch, I need to check with vendor firmware to be sure
19:50:00
@alex:tunstall.xyzAlex
In reply to @misuzu:matrix.org
That's likely a kernel issue, I've had no issues flashing latest firmware via recovery
It is: the DTB comes from the kernel.
19:50:29
@misuzu:matrix.orgmisuzu
In reply to @alex:tunstall.xyz
It is: the DTB comes from the kernel.
I've just tried 6.4.0-rc6 and it's still at 500000
19:52:50
@alex:tunstall.xyzAlex
In reply to @misuzu:matrix.org
I've just tried 6.4.0-rc6 and it's still at 500000

How interesting. Perhaps that is the default at boot and the system is unable to change it?

If you set the governor to userspace and try setting other frequencies via scaling_setspeed, are you able to get anything other than 500 MHz?

19:54:54
@misuzu:matrix.orgmisuzu
In reply to @alex:tunstall.xyz

How interesting. Perhaps that is the default at boot and the system is unable to change it?

If you set the governor to userspace and try setting other frequencies via scaling_setspeed, are you able to get anything other than 500 MHz?

Nope, tried 375000, 750000 and 1500000, still 500000
19:56:52
@alex:tunstall.xyzAlex
In reply to @misuzu:matrix.org
Nope, tried 375000, 750000 and 1500000, still 500000
I suspect your version of u-boot is lacking a patch needed to support it.
19:58:30
@misuzu:matrix.orgmisuzuYeah, that's probably it19:59:14
9 Jul 2023
@jkachmar:matrix.org@jkachmar:matrix.org joined the room.03:19:50
@thefossguy:matrix.orgPratham Patel
In reply to @alex:tunstall.xyz
I was on upstream 6.4.0 (from commit 4964ce0a869e) when I wrote that. I assume from your repository that this behaviour is from a build of e5a381c51d624ffd8784db908a58ae227d0608a4?
by upstream, do you mean StarFive's repo or Linus' tree? I belive Linus' tree is missing support for the eMMC node for the VF2 dtsi (haven't checked for -next).
11:14:28
@alex:tunstall.xyzAlex
In reply to @thefossguy:matrix.org
by upstream, do you mean StarFive's repo or Linus' tree? I belive Linus' tree is missing support for the eMMC node for the VF2 dtsi (haven't checked for -next).
Vendor's, sorry I was unclear (I'd call Linus' mainline).
11:15:32
@alex:tunstall.xyzAlexFWIW I tried mainline too but it didn't boot and I don't have the hardware to debug failed boots.11:16:26
@thefossguy:matrix.orgPratham PatelAh okay... I tried their 6.4-rc3 with my old arch image a few months ago... It would boot but the GPU drivers are tied to the vendor 5.15.0 kernel for now :(11:17:08
@thefossguy:matrix.orgPratham Patel
In reply to @alex:tunstall.xyz
FWIW I tried mainline too but it didn't boot and I don't have the hardware to debug failed boots.
Yeah, the mainline kernel doesn't know where the SD card is. I checked it via UART and it panicked at a recovery shell with a missing rootfs. Dug deeper to find out that the upstream DTB doesn't yet have an "entry" for the eMMC node.
11:18:21
@thefossguy:matrix.orgPratham PatelVendor kernel has this node: https://github.com/starfive-tech/linux/blob/b4920a1a3dd328124c61b07e8a6ab48c67881037/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-visionfive-v2.dtsi#L2311:21:02
@thefossguy:matrix.orgPratham PatelMeanwhile upstream doesn't yet have it: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/e2c510d6d630fe6593a0cf87531913b4b08ebeb1/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-starfive-visionfive-2.dtsi#L1811:21:33
@alex:tunstall.xyzAlex

For microSD, mmc1 is the correct node btw. I don't think mmc0 is used in the VF2, but it seems like it's for eMMC.

[nixos@nixos:/etc/nixos]$ lsblk
NAME        MAJ:MIN RM   SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS
mmcblk1     179:0    0 232.2G  0 disk 
├─mmcblk1p1 179:1    0   256M  0 part /boot
└─mmcblk1p2 179:2    0 231.9G  0 part /nix/store
                                      /
11:22:27
@thefossguy:matrix.orgPratham PatelYes, but both are missing from upstream ;)11:23:22
@alex:tunstall.xyzAlexOh dear, no ethernet in mainline either11:23:29
@thefossguy:matrix.orgPratham Patel:')11:23:47
10 Jul 2023
@trofi:matrix.orgtrofi

artemis: RE your past problems with libtool cross-compiling on Gentoo. I think I found the issue: if you run nix itself in a containerized environment nix silently falls back into the mode without a sandbox enabled (due to a sandbox-fallback = true) and happily runs unsandboxed builds in /tmp. ALl the bianries in /usr/bin and whatnot are available to the builds and this impurity contaminates the environemtn with /usr/lib library search paths breaks the builds.

The easy way to check it is to set sandbox-fallback = false in /etc/nix/nix.conf, restart nix-daemon and try to build something. If it fails that means you have been using unsandboxed builds.

08:32:39

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6