| 2 Jun 2023 |
 artemis | which maybe sounds weird but you have the stuff in place for building the kernel and u-boot and laying out the SD card and id rather build from that than do it myself, having done that myself plenty of times before | 08:45:52 |
|  @tamtaram:chat.heizhaus.org set a profile picture. | 11:54:19 |
| @tamtaram:chat.heizhaus.org changed their profile picture. | 12:06:04 |
 qbit | anyone running on a rpi zero w? | 19:17:25 |
|  mei 🌒& changed their display name from ckie (they/them; limited keyboard usage, voice preferred) to ckie (they/them). | 22:15:43 |
| @tamtaram:chat.heizhaus.org | In reply to @qbit:tapenet.org
anyone running on a rpi zero w? I was attempting to build for the pi1 which believe is the same SoC. I ran into some issues with some apps trying to compile hard float but the select arch didn't support it tho the Pi does thanks to its coprocessor. Gonna pick that back up soon | 23:48:43 |
| qbit | nice | 23:49:19 |
| @tamtaram:chat.heizhaus.org | Some packages enforce some odd flags for some reason. And I'm not talking about gcrypt or older compilers | 23:50:04 |
| 3 Jun 2023 |
|  Lotte (it/its)/Cinny (she/her) θΔ& changed their profile picture. | 09:41:09 |
 @jackleightcap:matrix.org | I'm just starting to dig into.RISC-V packages, lots of cool work going on :) | 19:18:59 |
| @jackleightcap:matrix.org | Is there a set of spots to look for when trying not to duplicate work? I see https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/compare/master...zhaofengli:nixpkgs:riscv used, but I'm not sure if there is another fork or something I'm missing | 19:19:51 |
| @jackleightcap:matrix.org | Context: is something like this: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/235812 upstreamable? Or is this better work to contribute elsewhere (or even a duplicate that I'm missing?) | 19:21:35 |
 fgaz | 
Download photo_2023-06-03_16-07-33.jpg | 19:31:38 |
| fgaz | it arrived \o/ | 19:32:05 |
| fgaz | Nix got a lot harder to compile than last time I tried. Lots of new dependencies with strict version requirements | 19:59:07 |
 raitobezarius | did someone figure out netboot for vf2? | 23:43:16 |
| raitobezarius | syslinux seems to be x86_64-linux only? | 23:43:23 |
| raitobezarius | # !!! Hack - attributes expected by other modules.
environment.systemPackages = [ pkgs.grub2_efi ]
++ (if pkgs.stdenv.hostPlatform.system == "aarch64-linux"
then []
else [ pkgs.grub2 pkgs.syslinux ]);
| 23:44:04 |
| raitobezarius | haha | 23:44:07 |
| raitobezarius | what the fresh hell | 23:44:13 |
| raitobezarius | I feel Alyssa now when she complains about me doing stupid things for hostPlatform | 23:44:36 |
| 4 Jun 2023 |
| raitobezarius | lovely | 00:13:42 |
| raitobezarius | 
Download image.png | 00:13:43 |
| raitobezarius | samueldr: GRUB2 is marked as "working" on RV64GC but it fails with Zifencei requirement during cross compilation, is that expected? | 02:58:58 |
 @samueldr:matrix.org | I couldn't say | 02:59:41 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | I guess you're saying its platforms declaration is bad (which it is imo)
- https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/90385792c887f63cc473c764f801be7a3f3894b6/pkgs/tools/misc/grub/default.nix#L458
| 03:00:23 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | good luck compiling grub for armv5tel | 03:00:39 |
| raitobezarius | :D :D | 03:02:33 |
| raitobezarius | I will see if I can get native compilation going | 03:02:40 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | that's part of the great debate about what platforms are | 03:02:53 |
