| 4 Jun 2023 |
 raitobezarius | I will see if I can get native compilation going | 03:02:40 |
 samueldr | that's part of the great debate about what platforms are | 03:02:53 |
| samueldr | it's an overload of two discrete things currently | 03:03:04 |
| samueldr | "what it should work on", and "what it's known to work on in Nixpkgs" | 03:03:15 |
| samueldr | the latter maybe should be "what it should work on" | 03:03:40 |
| raitobezarius | platforms vs. broken | 03:03:42 |
| samueldr | * the latter maybe should be "what it should work on in Nixpkgs" | 03:03:48 |
| raitobezarius | but yes | 03:03:50 |
| samueldr | and both are right, both are wrong, depending on what you do or want | 03:04:11 |
| raitobezarius | [Init] Starting Pixiecore goroutines
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
| 03:06:54 |
| raitobezarius | uboot why don't you want to send proper packets | 03:06:59 |
| raitobezarius | misuzu: I'm looking at your visionfive2's uboot "upstream" which I assume is a tree based on upstream uboot and not upstream vendor uboot? | 03:43:06 |
| raitobezarius | hence why there is no Ethernet on it :-[ | 03:43:11 |
| raitobezarius | it'd be nice if we could customize vendor uboot | 03:43:23 |
| raitobezarius | I need git-pw | 03:58:30 |
| raitobezarius | time to sleep | 03:58:34 |
 misuzu | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
misuzu: I'm looking at your visionfive2's uboot "upstream" which I assume is a tree based on upstream uboot and not upstream vendor uboot? yep | 05:40:14 |
| misuzu | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
did someone figure out netboot for vf2? should probably be the same as on aarch64 (uefi?) | 05:42:02 |
 artemis | anyone messed around with building 32bit pi images on 23.05? running into this http://dpaste.com/2LP59KW45 | 08:10:28 |
| artemis | modprobe: FATAL: Module ahci not found in directory /nix/store/ldvrfh5gcjkawa1v3994axma4sh2n5jp-linux-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf-6.1.21-1.20230405-modules/lib/modules/6.1.21 | 08:10:45 |
| artemis | * modprobe: FATAL: Module ahci not found in directory /nix/store/ldvrfh5gcjkawa1v3994axma4sh2n5jp-linux-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf-6.1.21-1.20230405-modules/lib/modules/6.1.21 (during the build) | 08:10:55 |
| artemis | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
syslinux seems to be x86_64-linux only? yeah so syslinux is x86_64 only but u-boot emulates syslinux is how it works | 08:11:43 |
| artemis | * yeah so syslinux is x86_64 only but u-boot emulates a subset of syslinux is how it works | 08:11:51 |
| artemis | u-boot also emulates a subset of pxelinux which i have used before. see https://artemis.sh/2022/05/16/everfrees-armferno.html#third-circle---pxeboot but that depends on u-boot being able to work with your network chip. no idea if it supports the vf2 networking. i am sure there are better ways but thats the one ive done before | 08:14:34 |
| artemis | * u-boot also emulates a subset of pxelinux which i have used before for netbooting. see https://artemis.sh/2022/05/16/everfrees-armferno.html#third-circle---pxeboot but that depends on u-boot being able to work with your network chip. no idea if it supports the vf2 networking. i am sure there are better ways but thats the one ive done before | 08:15:23 |
| artemis | ah i see reading scrollback more that you were trying this | 08:18:26 |
 [0x4A6F] | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
syslinux seems to be x86_64-linux only? No, I also stumbled on syslinux while trying to go nixos-anywhere on RISC-V. | 08:41:43 |
| [0x4A6F] | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
syslinux seems to be x86_64-linux only? * No, I also stumbled on syslinux while trying to work on nixos-anywhere on RISC-V. | 08:44:32 |
| misuzu | In reply to @artemis:arty.chat
anyone messed around with building 32bit pi images on 23.05? running into this http://dpaste.com/2LP59KW45 I've native armv7l-linux images https://hydra.armv7l.xyz/jobset/nixpkgs/nixos-unstable | 08:48:25 |
| artemis | oh cool htanks | 08:49:06 |
