| 4 Jun 2023 |
raitobezarius | I will see if I can get native compilation going | 03:02:40 |
samueldr | that's part of the great debate about what platforms are | 03:02:53 |
samueldr | it's an overload of two discrete things currently | 03:03:04 |
samueldr | "what it should work on", and "what it's known to work on in Nixpkgs" | 03:03:15 |
samueldr | the latter maybe should be "what it should work on" | 03:03:40 |
raitobezarius | platforms vs. broken | 03:03:42 |
samueldr | * the latter maybe should be "what it should work on in Nixpkgs" | 03:03:48 |
raitobezarius | but yes | 03:03:50 |
samueldr | and both are right, both are wrong, depending on what you do or want | 03:04:11 |
raitobezarius | [Init] Starting Pixiecore goroutines
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
[DHCP] Ignoring packet from 6c:cf:39:00:23:e2: not a PXE boot request (missing option 93)
| 03:06:54 |
raitobezarius | uboot why don't you want to send proper packets | 03:06:59 |
raitobezarius | misuzu: I'm looking at your visionfive2's uboot "upstream" which I assume is a tree based on upstream uboot and not upstream vendor uboot? | 03:43:06 |
raitobezarius | hence why there is no Ethernet on it :-[ | 03:43:11 |
raitobezarius | it'd be nice if we could customize vendor uboot | 03:43:23 |
raitobezarius | I need git-pw | 03:58:30 |
raitobezarius | time to sleep | 03:58:34 |