| 2 Jun 2023 |
 trofi | to avoid backporting known fixes (and bugs) that were already backported :) | 06:58:36 |
| trofi | If you add sandbox-fallback = false to /etc/nix/nix.conf, do nix build commands start failing for you? | 07:40:45 |
 artemis | added that, ran rc-service nix-daemon restart, there doesn't seem to be a change in behavior in `nix build` | 07:54:07 |
| artemis | rebuild of x86 host libtool worked still. build of cross libtool failed still | 07:54:37 |
| trofi | nod. I'll try to figure out why sandbox gets disabled for me and get back to you later. | 08:01:59 |
| artemis | ^^ thanks for taking a crack at it | 08:05:41 |
 misuzu | In reply to @artemis:arty.chat
though. DHCP never succeeds for some reason so i am forever stuck with the DHCP 169.whatever address You probably have v1.3B board but image is configured for v1.2A. You could try mine prebuilt image for v1.3B boards: https://github.com/misuzu/nixos-vf2/releases | 08:09:39 |
| artemis | thanks, ill give that a try tomorrow | 08:10:15 |
| misuzu | In reply to @artemis:arty.chat
thanks, ill give that a try tomorrow Board version is printed near the cpu | 08:10:39 |
| artemis | oh yes it does say v1.3B | 08:11:21 |
| misuzu | v1.3B has different ethernet chip | 08:11:56 |
| artemis | that would do it. does the second ethernet port work on your image also? | 08:14:34 |
| misuzu | I did not test it, but I think it should work | 08:15:06 |
| misuzu | In reply to @artemis:arty.chat
it is maybe interesting information they we're using nix from gentoo You probably have single-user installation or sandboxing disabled. When installed via sh <(curl -L https://nixos.org/nix/install) --daemon it should work without issues (systemd is required though) | 08:17:26 |
 Snektron | In reply to @artemis:arty.chat
though. DHCP never succeeds for some reason so i am forever stuck with the DHCP 169.whatever address Did you try the other ethernet port? | 08:32:24 |
| artemis | yeah the other ethernet port doesnt even recognize a cable plugged in | 08:32:38 |
| Snektron | 1.3b or 1.2a? | 08:32:59 |
| Snektron | In reply to @artemis:arty.chat
oh yes it does say v1.3B Oh | 08:34:24 |
| artemis | yeah lol | 08:34:41 |
| Snektron | That could be it | 08:34:48 |
| Snektron | You can try just changing the device tree in the sd config | 08:35:17 |
| artemis | ill probably do that yeah. gonna end up needing to muck around with the config anyway because i want to try and convince your thing to build me a gentoo image | 08:44:42 |
| artemis | which maybe sounds weird but you have the stuff in place for building the kernel and u-boot and laying out the SD card and id rather build from that than do it myself, having done that myself plenty of times before | 08:45:52 |
|  @tamtaram:chat.heizhaus.org set a profile picture. | 11:54:19 |
| @tamtaram:chat.heizhaus.org changed their profile picture. | 12:06:04 |
 qbit | anyone running on a rpi zero w? | 19:17:25 |
|  ckie (they/them) changed their display name from ckie (they/them; limited keyboard usage, voice preferred) to ckie (they/them). | 22:15:43 |
| @tamtaram:chat.heizhaus.org | In reply to @qbit:tapenet.org
anyone running on a rpi zero w? I was attempting to build for the pi1 which believe is the same SoC. I ran into some issues with some apps trying to compile hard float but the select arch didn't support it tho the Pi does thanks to its coprocessor. Gonna pick that back up soon | 23:48:43 |
| qbit | nice | 23:49:19 |
| @tamtaram:chat.heizhaus.org | Some packages enforce some odd flags for some reason. And I'm not talking about gcrypt or older compilers | 23:50:04 |
