| 3 Jun 2023 |
 @jackleightcap:matrix.org | Is there a set of spots to look for when trying not to duplicate work? I see https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/compare/master...zhaofengli:nixpkgs:riscv used, but I'm not sure if there is another fork or something I'm missing | 19:19:51 |
| @jackleightcap:matrix.org | Context: is something like this: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/235812 upstreamable? Or is this better work to contribute elsewhere (or even a duplicate that I'm missing?) | 19:21:35 |
 fgaz | 
Download photo_2023-06-03_16-07-33.jpg | 19:31:38 |
| fgaz | it arrived \o/ | 19:32:05 |
| fgaz | Nix got a lot harder to compile than last time I tried. Lots of new dependencies with strict version requirements | 19:59:07 |
 raitobezarius | did someone figure out netboot for vf2? | 23:43:16 |
| raitobezarius | syslinux seems to be x86_64-linux only? | 23:43:23 |
| raitobezarius | # !!! Hack - attributes expected by other modules.
environment.systemPackages = [ pkgs.grub2_efi ]
++ (if pkgs.stdenv.hostPlatform.system == "aarch64-linux"
then []
else [ pkgs.grub2 pkgs.syslinux ]);
| 23:44:04 |
| raitobezarius | haha | 23:44:07 |
| raitobezarius | what the fresh hell | 23:44:13 |
| raitobezarius | I feel Alyssa now when she complains about me doing stupid things for hostPlatform | 23:44:36 |
| 4 Jun 2023 |
| raitobezarius | lovely | 00:13:42 |
| raitobezarius | 
Download image.png | 00:13:43 |
| raitobezarius | samueldr: GRUB2 is marked as "working" on RV64GC but it fails with Zifencei requirement during cross compilation, is that expected? | 02:58:58 |
 @samueldr:matrix.org | I couldn't say | 02:59:41 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | I guess you're saying its platforms declaration is bad (which it is imo)
- https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/90385792c887f63cc473c764f801be7a3f3894b6/pkgs/tools/misc/grub/default.nix#L458
| 03:00:23 |
