| 14 Jan 2024 |
 @samueldr:matrix.org | trofi you missed it yesterday, I think, but I have a hacked-up "improper" setup building their samples already | 21:44:21 |
 @trofi:matrix.org | aha, nice! | 21:44:33 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | but it's not relying on Nixpkgs to do cross | 21:44:35 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | it's "just" the packages and some environmental hacking to make it work like their "SDK" does | 21:45:07 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | it's relatively straightforward, I think | 21:45:16 |
| @trofi:matrix.org | nod | 21:45:21 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | I meant, their SDK is straightforward | 21:45:35 |
| @trofi:matrix.org | gcc before 3.3 had a slightly different bin directory layout from cross-compiling. i wonder if you had to deal with it. | 21:45:38 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | http://www.chokanji.com/developer/download.html | 21:46:41 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | knowing that, I understand that I was observing | 21:47:17 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | and I had to deal with it, but it wasn't that much of a deal, since I had their SDK to ape | 21:47:31 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | for PROG in ''${PROGS[@]}; do
ln -sf ${binutils}/bin/i386-unknown-gnu-$PROG $PROG
done
| 21:47:40 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | stuff like that I think you meant? | 21:47:48 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | oh, and for the new folks reading today: there is no stakes here... I'm doing it for the fun of deepening my understanding of non-trivial cross | 21:48:19 |
| @trofi:matrix.org | Yeah, and lib paths like
+if tc_version_is_at_least 3.4.0 ; then
+ LIBPATH=${TOOLCHAIN_LIBPATH:-${PREFIX}/lib/gcc/${CTARGET}/${GCC_CONFIG_VER}}
+else
+ LIBPATH=${TOOLCHAIN_LIBPATH:-${PREFIX}/lib/gcc-lib/${CTARGET}/${GCC_CONFIG_VER}}
+fi
| 21:50:28 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | * cd lib/gcc-lib/i386-unknown-gnu/$version
# ...
for PROG in ''${PROGS[@]}; do
ln -sf ${binutils}/bin/i386-unknown-gnu-$PROG $PROG
done
| 21:50:53 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | * cd $out/lib/gcc-lib/i386-unknown-gnu/$version
# ...
for PROG in ''${PROGS[@]}; do
ln -sf ${binutils}/bin/i386-unknown-gnu-$PROG $PROG
done
| 21:51:04 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | yeah, added some context | 21:51:12 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | knowing that might have allowed me to try a newer gcc in the "non-nixpkgs" setup... still might allow | 21:51:42 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | though I have good enough hints to know that newer gcc should also just work | 21:51:59 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | https://github.com/samueldr/nixpkgs/commits/wip/brightv-cross | 22:31:53 |
| @samueldr:matrix.org | just finished looking/trying/packaging | 22:32:11 |
