Exotic Nix Targets | 325 Members | |
| 101 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Jan 2024 | ||
| don't hesitate to poke me later if you need stuff | 03:55:36 | |
| 07:18:48 | ||
| 17 Jan 2024 | ||
| I've been thinking about B-right/V and how to help it out a bit produce working things... so one of the main "issues" is that it is not a unix, so many assumptions fail in programs... ... but it does have a so the main problem(s) I'm seeing here is as follows:
that is because I would like to, somehow, have:
so I guess I need to find a way to get the cross | 21:17:41 | |
| * I've been thinking about B-right/V and how to help it out a bit produce working things... so one of the main "issues" is that it is not a unix, so many assumptions fail in programs... ... but it does have a so the main problem(s) I'm seeing here is as follows:
that is because I would like to, somehow, have:
so I guess I need to find a way to get the cross | 21:17:52 | |
| is there anything in there that sounds incorrect? | 21:18:25 | |
| * I've been thinking about B-right/V and how to help it out a bit produce working things... so one of the main "issues" is that it is not a unix, so many assumptions fail in programs... ... but it does have a so the main problem(s) I'm seeing here is as follows:
that is because I would like to, somehow, have:
so I guess I need to find a way to get the cross | 21:20:26 | |
| 25 Jan 2024 | ||
| 05:52:37 | ||
| 27 Jan 2024 | ||
| 01:59:36 | ||
| 16:53:48 | ||
| 16:59:53 | ||
| 17:03:37 | ||
| 29 Jan 2024 | ||
| 11:00:10 | ||
| 11:06:01 | ||
| 30 Jan 2024 | ||
| 19:55:32 | ||
| 31 Jan 2024 | ||
| 03:36:44 | ||
| 06:22:20 | ||
| 2 Feb 2024 | ||
is gettext meant to have bash in its buildInputs? (Should it not be a nativeBuildInput?) Under pkgsStatic, it gets propagated. So if you do something like nix build --dry-run nixpkgs#pkgsStatic.gettext, it fetches bash-dev, because under cross, the buildInput becomes a propagatedBuildInput for some reason. I noticed because I was puzzled that bash ended up as a dependency. | 19:38:40 | |
| Yes, because it installs bash scripts that need to have their shebang patched. | 19:45:32 | |
| IIRC | 19:46:16 | |
Nothing crossOverlays = [(self: super: { gettext = super.gettext.override { bash = super.buildPackages.bash; }; })]; can't fix I suppose... 🤫 | 19:50:51 | |
| 3 Feb 2024 | ||
| 02:52:59 | ||
| 11:49:19 | ||
| 6 Feb 2024 | ||
| Not particularly exotic but - somehow while messing with nixpkgs for FreeBSD I broke llvm tests on Linux. The failing test case seems to complain about the dot executable not being in the path? I can’t find any evidence of this having ever been a dependency or a disabled test, so what could have gone wrong? | 02:40:11 | |
| The change that broke it had nothing to do with llvm - I changed a var that should be a no-op on Linux for bison | 02:41:42 | |
| Note that this is the nix installed from Ubuntu apt, which doesn’t use the sandbox | 02:42:08 | |
| 8 Feb 2024 | ||
| I'd ask if you can reproduce this with sandbox first | 18:53:37 | |
| We don't really support sandboxless usecases | 18:53:41 | |
| I did in fact try with the sandbox and it worked perfectly | 19:00:33 | |
| Debian considered harmful I guess | 19:00:48 | |
I'd say it's a nix's defaults bug that it allows for an unsandboxed runs so easily. | 22:59:25 | |