| 14 Jan 2024 |
 samueldr | it is part of the other "non-common" sdk bits | 23:03:41 |
| samueldr | I'm cleaning up the "common" bits right now to better handle that afterward | 23:04:10 |
| 15 Jan 2024 |
| samueldr | neat!
/nix/store/hc0k7rs4jjb8m75z0h9nyy1nxq9ag4v1-i386-unknown-gnu-binutils-2.40/bin/i386-unknown-gnu-ld: cannot find crti.o: No such file or directory
/nix/store/hc0k7rs4jjb8m75z0h9nyy1nxq9ag4v1-i386-unknown-gnu-binutils-2.40/bin/i386-unknown-gnu-ld: cannot find -lc: No such file or directory
/nix/store/hc0k7rs4jjb8m75z0h9nyy1nxq9ag4v1-i386-unknown-gnu-binutils-2.40/bin/i386-unknown-gnu-ld: cannot find crtn.o: No such file or directory
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
it means it's actually attempting to link with the libc! | 01:08:16 |
| samueldr | (which was an issue I knew I'd need to handle) | 01:08:39 |
| samueldr | (not stuck yet, looking into the specs files, what they are, etc...) | 01:28:54 |
| samueldr | oh, I don't exactly like that they're generated from the built compiler | 02:07:34 |
| samueldr | ah, though seems relatively straightforwardly part of \.h files | 02:08:28 |
| samueldr | * ah, though seems relatively straightforwardly part of .h files | 02:08:31 |
| samueldr | can't build hello, but I'm not surprised by that | 05:47:11 |
| samueldr | lib/getprogname.c: In function 'getprogname':
lib/getprogname.c:287:4: error: #error "getprogname module not ported to this OS"
# error "getprogname module not ported to this OS"
| 05:47:14 |
| samueldr | 
Download clipboard.png | 06:07:13 |
| samueldr | some (a couple) crimes still to be managed, but the proof is the binary works | 06:07:29 |
 raitobezarius | Ok Nix when now | 06:37:53 |
| samueldr | it's not even unix | 06:38:04 |
| raitobezarius | Never heard it mattered for Nix :> | 06:38:25 |
| samueldr | it doesn't have the concept of directories, or files | 06:38:38 |
| samueldr | (both are the same, they're records) | 06:38:50 |
| samueldr | (not that it would actually prevent Nix from maybe be a thing) | 06:39:16 |
| raitobezarius | If I squint the Nix store is a bunch of records I'm sure :> | 06:39:17 |
| raitobezarius | Joke aside, can you compile more complicated stuff now? | 06:39:27 |
| samueldr | cleaning it up, and deciding the best way forward then | 06:39:53 |
| raitobezarius | Like does git run on that ? :D | 06:39:55 |
| samueldr | not as far as I know | 06:40:02 |
| raitobezarius | Fascinating | 06:40:17 |
| samueldr | right now I only have my crimes done in gcc 4.9 | 06:40:33 |
| samueldr | (took less time to build, and given what I had found from someone doing cross-compiler shenanigans on openbsd, was likely to work) | 06:41:09 |
| samueldr | the most up-to-date hints of a gcc working is about gcc-9.4.0 | 06:41:44 |
| samueldr | though they don't need any of my crimes since they make their own specs file and the vendor SDK uses that | 06:42:12 |
| samueldr | wheee https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/compare/master...samueldr:nixpkgs:wip/brightv-cross | 08:21:50 |
 trofi | Fixing gcc on alpha :) https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/275631 | 09:59:07 |
