!pbdtvoHxUGLhcEvnlu:nixos.org

Exotic Nix Targets

325 Members
100 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
12 Sep 2023
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn Ericsonthere are certainly still platform checks needed19:41:23
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn Ericsondon't get me worng19:41:27
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn Ericsonbut I just don't think native should need more than cross19:41:39
13 Sep 2023
@mib:kanp.aimib 🥐 joined the room.08:28:08
@theesm:lispy.eu@theesm:lispy.eu joined the room.22:51:27
16 Sep 2023
@majiir:matrix.orgMajiir Paktu joined the room.00:04:14
@p14:matrix.orgp14I've got a pipeline of things I want to fix to make pkgsLLVM.pkgsStatic to work well, but review is going slow. I don't want to generate a mass of PRs which go unreviewed for a long time since that risks increasing the infinite TODO list for everybody. Any kind souls able to help me clear this review from the pipeline? I hope it is uncontroversial. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/25311609:06:10
@p14:matrix.orgp14 Alyssa Ross: thanks for the review. (AFK so responding here rather than gh for a moment) Is it possible you have missed that link type is a single word value “static” or “dynamic” according to the output of the checkLinkType function? If not, I don’t understand, can you clarify? 09:29:09
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa RossI did miss that :)09:29:26
20 Sep 2023
@rhelmot:matrix.orgrhelmotI've added to my PR the ability to parameterize the freebsd packages so they can be cross compiled for either freebsd13 or freebsd14. I can now compile all the inputs necessary for the freebsd stdenv. what's the protocol on being able to access a cross-compiled package from a native-booting stdenv? I assume there's some magic somewhere to make it so the hashes line up, but I'm not sure what that would look like.07:03:37
@rhelmot:matrix.orgrhelmot * I've added to my PR the ability to parameterize the freebsd packages so they can be cross compiled for either freebsd13 or freebsd14. I can now cross compile all the inputs necessary for the freebsd stdenv. what's the protocol on being able to access a cross-compiled package from a native-booting stdenv? I assume there's some magic somewhere to make it so the hashes line up, but I'm not sure what that would look like.07:04:12
@rhelmot:matrix.orgrhelmotif the answer is "no such thing", what exactly is john's vision in terms of being able to use cross compilation to generate substitutes such that nix can run on freebsd and actually download them as needed?07:10:35
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Ross You can import <nixpkgs> { localSystem = "x86_64-linux"; crossSystem = "x86_64-freebsd"; } or something and get the same packages 08:07:12
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossbut if I understand correctly, what John means to do is to cross compile some packages, and use them to generate a bootstrap tarball for the native stdenv, not to substitute them directly. 08:07:47
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa RossAlso hi! Sorry, I haven't had much of a chance to look at your work so far.08:07:56
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa RossRe: FreeBSD version: the reason we have "13" in the triples is because we misunderstood how backwards compatible FreeBSD is. Probably it would be fine to just target a single version.08:08:57
@rhelmot:matrix.orgrhelmot Can you elaborate on the misunderstanding? I certainly encountered binary incompatibilities (potentially solved by nix and strict library versioning?) while upgrading from 13 to 14. 12:36:06
@rhelmot:matrix.orgrhelmotAlso hi :)12:36:10
@rhelmot:matrix.orgrhelmot If that’s the vision, why can the bootstrap binaries not be generated by the (fully booted?) impure stdenv? This definitely sounds like a situation where I’m misunderstanding the benefits of purity, but to my knowledge it would be solved by a bunch of binary auditing. 12:40:14
@rhelmot:matrix.orgrhelmot* Can you elaborate on the misunderstanding? I certainly encountered binary incompatibilities (upgraded my kernel but not my userland on accident and very little would still run? I hope I’m misremembering that) while upgrading from 13 to 14.12:47:19
@rhelmot:matrix.orgrhelmotthere's a very easy way to test the binary compatibility thing. I can just copy some of the 13 binaries onto my 14 system (and vice versa with a VM) and see what happens13:28:05
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa RossI'll see if I can find the conversation13:28:47
@7c6f434c:nitro.chat7c6f434cI believe FreeBSD promises nothing on major-version kernel-libc mixing. Does anything survive anyway is an empirical question, of course15:05:53
@rhelmot:matrix.orgrhelmot side note: if nix-build ./nixpkgs --argstr crossSystem x86_64-freebsd14 --show-trace -A bash and nix-build ./nixpkgs --show-trace -A pkgsCross.x86_64-freebsd14.bash are different did I do something wrong? 15:08:37
@rhelmot:matrix.orgrhelmot * ~~side note: if nix-build ./nixpkgs --argstr crossSystem x86_64-freebsd14 --show-trace -A bash and nix-build ./nixpkgs --show-trace -A pkgsCross.x86_64-freebsd14.bash are different did I do something wrong?~~ (edit: figured it out. gotta do --arg with all of the example system attributes, including useLLVM) 18:48:02
21 Sep 2023
@dedmunwalk:matrix.orgdedmunwalk joined the room.23:05:26
22 Sep 2023
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️ @Alyssa Ross btw, i have a patch that fixes your pr #233470. could you take a look and maybe pull that into your pr? 22:52:35
23 Sep 2023
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossooh07:25:19
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossthis looks like great work07:25:23
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa RossI will try to take a look but can't promise atm07:25:32

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6