!pbdtvoHxUGLhcEvnlu:nixos.org

Exotic Nix Targets

358 Members
113 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
17 Mar 2026
@k900:0upti.meK900I don't even know08:45:55
@k900:0upti.meK900How many cores a single rack can have these days08:46:08
@k900:0upti.meK900The last s390x I've had the questionable pleasure of using was a ... z10?08:47:10
@amaan:amaanq.comamaanthink the one i have access to is z1508:49:16
@artemist:nixos.devArtemis Tosini (NixOS)iirc there's no support for alpha in nixpkgs. Not having hydra isn't a total dealbreaker, Audrey and I developed much of NixBSD both native and cross with just our own machines15:55:15
@artemist:nixos.devArtemis Tosini (NixOS)If someone does write alpha support please merge it, I looked at it once and dis ome work but got bored before I made a PR, so noe veryone has to do it again15:56:20
@opna2608:matrix.orgPunai might do sparc64 eventually, when powerpc64 is further along and i have to worry less about other things. scored a sun ultra 2 + monitor when my uni dissolved their sun pool16:05:57
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa RossAre toolchains actually going to keep supporting these dead architectures?16:06:50
@opna2608:matrix.orgPuna¯\_(ツ)_/¯16:07:09
@opna2608:matrix.orgPunaas long as there are ppl willing to chip in with code & testing, maybe?16:09:43
@opna2608:matrix.orgPunamore willing than for itanium at least16:10:01
@aelin:postmarketos.orgAelinconsidering GCC only dropped Itanium like last year I wouldn't worry about sparc6416:10:13
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa RossI'm fine with having Nixpkgs support them, but I'd be significatly less fine with Nixpkgs trying to support dead architectures that upstream toolchains have dropped support for.16:10:37
@7c6f434c:nitro.chat7c6f434c Well, if we have avrgcc, one might argue for some flexibility on what counts as upstream toolchain (but of course the expectations on what patches can be pushed for compatibility fixes are quite restrictive for such a platform) 16:18:45
@opna2608:matrix.orgPunadoes LLVM even support alpha?16:23:49
@opna2608:matrix.orgPunadoesn't look like it, so anything needing LLVM or Rust would be off the table. not seeing any mentions of it in Go either. GHC can identify it, would have to yoink & patch another prebuilt compiler from debian to test that though.16:32:37
@artemist:nixos.devArtemis Tosini (NixOS)nixpkgs can do ppc32, which go won't do19:00:32
@opna2608:matrix.orgPunayeah i guess no Go isn't much of a blocker19:15:21
@opna2608:matrix.orgPuna (it's also a no-go on ppc64 cus they raised their baseline way too high, and refuse to undo it) 19:17:11
@colemickens:matrix.orgcolemickens joined the room.19:36:22
@panic:sft.lol@panic:sft.lol left the room.20:36:06
18 Mar 2026
@screaming:lobotomise.meaphasic joined the room.06:35:06
23 May 2021
@grahamc:nixos.org@grahamc:nixos.org set the history visibility to "world_readable".12:23:31
@grahamc:nixos.org@grahamc:nixos.org changed the room name to "" from "".12:23:31
@grahamc:nixos.org@grahamc:nixos.org invited @qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Ross.12:31:10
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Ross joined the room.13:20:51
@server_stats:nordgedanken.devServer Stats Discoverer (traveler bot) joined the room.13:28:40
@abbe:badti.meabbe joined the room.13:29:04
@andi:kack.itandi- joined the room.13:30:12
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him) joined the room.13:34:50

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6