!tDnwWRNkmmYtMXfaZl:nixos.org

Nix Language

1441 Members
Nix programming language258 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
16 Jul 2024
@bnesbitt:matrix.orgbnesbitt joined the room.12:39:39
@tormod.hellen:matrix.org@tormod.hellen:matrix.org left the room.20:04:54
@judson:matrix.org@judson:matrix.org left the room.21:33:03
@alex3829:matrix.org@alex3829:matrix.org left the room.23:17:03
17 Jul 2024
@meetmangukiya:matrix.org@meetmangukiya:matrix.org left the room.04:36:58
@hlad:hlad.orghlad joined the room.10:45:44
18 Jul 2024
@tewi:queer.cattewi 🏳️‍⚧️ joined the room.00:23:43
@feel_stool:matrix.orgfeel_stool joined the room.16:14:57
@vtrenton:chat.lfx.linuxfoundation.orgTrenton VanderWert joined the room.23:04:22
@tewi:queer.cattewi 🏳️‍⚧️ changed their profile picture.23:50:52
@tewi:queer.cattewi 🏳️‍⚧️ removed their profile picture.23:52:42
@tewi:queer.cattewi 🏳️‍⚧️ set a profile picture.23:53:18
19 Jul 2024
@codeboy:matrix.orgC0deboy joined the room.04:19:13
@usor:matrix.orgusor joined the room.13:02:23
@easel:matrix.orgeasel changed their profile picture.14:17:24
@traxys:familleboyer.netTraxysBy any chance is there a way to know the git branch in a flake? I need to generate a package differently if it's from the main branch vs a stable branch (mostly links to the corresponding branch)18:04:40
@tomberek:matrix.orgtomberekNo. Because branches are mutable over time, this would allow you to have two different outcomes over time for the same commit. The way to do this would be to run a packaging script prior to your build that would add the branch name into a file of the flake, then running a "dirty" build.18:36:28
@duanin2:duanin2.topDuanin2 joined the room.18:47:02
@mattsturg:matrix.orgMatt SturgeonOr alternatively (since I assume you mean a branched off release) define the "release name" in a file/variable/whatever (committed to the repo)19:20:19
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan LepageThis is what is being done in nixpkgs I think19:35:44
@mattsturg:matrix.orgMatt Sturgeon
In reply to @glepage:matrix.org
This is what is being done in nixpkgs I think
Yes they have lib.release or something similarly named
19:49:28
@mattsturg:matrix.orgMatt Sturgeon* Yes they have  lib.release  or something similarly named, which just a string literal defined somewhere 19:50:07
@mattsturg:matrix.orgMatt Sturgeon* Yes they have  `lib.release`  or something similarly named, which just a string literal defined somewhere19:50:16
@cathal03:matrix.orgCathal OGradycan I have a thin nix shell that does not dowload gcc coreutils etc ?23:09:45
@ss:someonex.netSomeoneSerge (UTC+3)s/branches/branches and tags/23:31:17
20 Jul 2024
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil Cathal OGrady: pkgs.mkShellNoCC should do it mostly 01:43:46
@brisingr05:matrix.orgbrisingr05 left the room.05:48:38
@brisingr05:matrix.orgbrisingr05 joined the room.05:57:15
@cathal03:matrix.orgCathal OGrady
In reply to@infinisil:matrix.org
Cathal OGrady: pkgs.mkShellNoCC should do it mostly
thank you !
09:48:44
@username:yatrix.org@username:yatrix.org left the room.10:23:13

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6