| 9 Sep 2024 |
 lingo5080 | can anyone spot what I'm doing wrong on line 29 here? https://gist.github.com/valan/2105806a4c7da121bc09e53cbe262466#file-ssh-nix-L29 | 05:11:30 |
 Kamilla 'ova | In reply to@lingo5080:matrix.org
can anyone spot what I'm doing wrong on line 29 here? https://gist.github.com/valan/2105806a4c7da121bc09e53cbe262466#file-ssh-nix-L29 useless lambda | 05:28:53 |
| Kamilla 'ova | * useless lambda? | 05:28:56 |
| lingo5080 | oh yeah that was after messing around trying to find the issue, I initially had just the function passed in | 05:39:58 |
| lingo5080 | I updated gist to switch it back and added the somewhat unhelpful error I'm getting | 05:42:48 |
| Kamilla 'ova | In reply to@lingo5080:matrix.org
I updated gist to switch it back and added the somewhat unhelpful error I'm getting please rerun it with --show-trace and post a new error | 05:46:25 |
| lingo5080 | I'm kind of new to this, where exactly do I need to put --show-trace? | 05:46:57 |
| Kamilla 'ova | In reply to@lingo5080:matrix.org
I'm kind of new to this, where exactly do I need to put --show-trace? nix repl | 05:47:24 |
| Kamilla 'ova | And I think the right channel for this question is #Nix / NixOS | 05:48:43 |
| lingo5080 | ah ok, looks like I'm getting more helpful errors. I'll take some time to mess with this more, ty | 05:51:40 |
|  @paez:matrix.org left the room. | 06:27:09 |
|  declension joined the room. | 16:02:06 |
|  Lulu joined the room. | 20:41:17 |
| 10 Sep 2024 |
|  dergutemoritz joined the room. | 09:28:24 |
|  netbrain joined the room. | 15:32:36 |
|  (artur 'manuel) changed their display name from (lambda (u) (format nil "~A lost their email!" u)) "Artur Manuel" to Artur Manuel (on break). | 17:33:04 |
| (artur 'manuel) changed their profile picture. | 17:35:26 |
| (artur 'manuel) changed their display name from Artur Manuel (on break) to (lambda (u) (format nil "~A is not using Matrix right now." u)) "Artur Manuel". | 17:37:05 |
|  0x4d0n1s joined the room. | 18:55:33 |
| 11 Sep 2024 |
|  @aftix:matrix.org left the room. | 03:11:12 |
|  @adis:blad.is left the room. | 06:15:03 |
|  David Rose joined the room. | 11:38:20 |
|  Adda joined the room. | 19:22:37 |
| 12 Sep 2024 |
| (artur 'manuel) changed their display name from (lambda (u) (format nil "~A is not using Matrix right now." u)) "Artur Manuel" to (lambda (u) (format nil "~a ~a")) "Artur" "Manuel". | 01:49:34 |
| (artur 'manuel) changed their display name from (lambda (u) (format nil "~a ~a")) "Artur" "Manuel" to (lambda (f l) (format nil "~a ~a")) "Artur" "Manuel". | 01:56:21 |
|  @kaisercalm:matrix.org joined the room. | 11:04:54 |
| @kaisercalm:matrix.org left the room. | 11:05:32 |
 h7x4 | I realize this might be implementation specific and doesn't belong in this channel, but does anyone know whether there is a time/space complexity table for the builtins anywhere? I find it hard to reason about the complexity of the functions on top when it comes to builtins like listToAttrs, // and removeAttrs. | 14:46:20 |
 emily | time complexity is a subtle thing when you're talking about a lazy language, but my understanding is that attrsets are strict in the spine and represented as flat tables | 14:55:00 |
| emily | so listToAttrs and // should be O(n), not sure about removeAttrs | 14:55:22 |
