Sender | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
27 Jul 2024 | ||
rendakuenthusiast⚡️ | In reply to @mattsturg:matrix.orgin particular interpolation for integers, which should be very easy to do | 22:55:19 |
28 Jul 2024 | ||
Kamilla 'ova | Hi, can someone explain this behavior? | 18:54:00 |
Kamilla 'ova | Download image.png | 18:54:08 |
emily | oh boy | 19:16:32 |
emily | that's not the only platform divergence, try builtins.split "" 🙃 | 19:16:49 |
emily | but this might be a new one | 19:16:57 |
emily | you might want to report it upstream | 19:47:21 |
29 Jul 2024 | ||
andmuz joined the room. | 00:49:46 | |
@rayne:spooky.computer left the room. | 03:38:31 | |
@kenzie:matrix.kenzi.dev left the room. | 06:57:49 | |
Kodin joined the room. | 07:04:18 | |
@mariosangiorgio:matrix.org left the room. | 07:21:39 | |
Travis joined the room. | 15:04:04 | |
@minec:ins4.xyz joined the room. | 16:41:04 | |
infinisil | Neat find! | 23:10:50 |
30 Jul 2024 | ||
quapka4 | Hi folks, let's say I am building a derivation that depends on many pkgs and I wanna be able to build the final derivation with various versions of the dependencies. What is a clean way to do it? I was thinking something like:
| 09:08:44 |
quapka4 | * Hi folks, let's say I am building a derivation that depends on many pkgs and I wanna be able to build the final derivation with various versions of the dependencies. What is a clean way to do it? I was thinking something like:
| 09:08:48 |
quapka4 | And then if version of a given package is provided I will rebuild it. | 09:09:09 |
raf changed their display name from notashelf to raf. | 10:04:55 | |
raf changed their display name from raf to NotAShelf. | 10:05:49 | |
Matt Sturgeon | Normally you would do this using the When you call your derivation using
| 10:26:26 |
Matt Sturgeon | * Normally you would do this using the When you call your derivation using
| 10:27:04 |
Matt Sturgeon | * Normally you would do this using the When you call your derivation using
| 10:28:00 |
Zm94ZGV2 changed their profile picture. | 10:33:26 | |
quapka4 | Thanks! | 10:43:56 |
quapka4 | Hm, inherit name.value to inherit value as value does not work? Is there a reason or different syntax needed? Would such a use case make sense? | 11:31:51 |
LordMZTE | You want inherit (name) value; here. I think this is in place so you can inherit multiple values without it looking strange. you could have inherit (name) value otherValue; for example. | 11:43:01 |
quapka4 | Can I do that for multiple values? Say I have
| 11:52:00 |
quapka4 | I tried:
But can't get it to work. | 11:53:02 |
LordMZTE | The third one should work. Can you show the error you're getting? | 11:54:13 |