26 Jul 2024 |
mr-qubo | Oh, sorry, wrong room. | 17:43:48 |
mr-qubo | * Oh, sorry, I've just noticed it's wrong room. | 17:43:55 |
27 Jul 2024 |
| valconius joined the room. | 00:46:22 |
| aetaric joined the room. | 06:56:20 |
| aetaric set a profile picture. | 07:04:10 |
| bumperboat left the room. | 11:58:44 |
rendakuenthusiast⚡️ | why doesn't string interpolation work with integers? | 22:40:20 |
rendakuenthusiast⚡️ | having to manually call (toString port-number) is kinda inconveneint | 22:40:38 |
Tranquil Ity | In reply to @test-user:c.imperishable.name why doesn't string interpolation work with integers? What would you want it to do ? JavaScript? | 22:41:14 |
rendakuenthusiast⚡️ | basically have the "string-${variable}syntax automatically call toString` if necessary | 22:41:37 |
rendakuenthusiast⚡️ | which is what many languages with string interpolation syntax do | 22:41:51 |
rendakuenthusiast⚡️ | * basically have the "string-${variable}" syntax automatically calltoString if necessary | 22:42:10 |
Matt Sturgeon | There's some precedent for this already: paths and derivations are stringified when used with string interpolation.
AFAIK most languages that have string formatting and/or string interpolation automatically stringify non-string values?
I get why you may want concatenation to be explicit about the type, but interpolation feels different 🤔 | 22:46:21 |
Tranquil Ity | In reply to @test-user:c.imperishable.name basically have the "string-${variable}" syntax automatically calltoString if necessary Ah | 22:54:39 |
rendakuenthusiast⚡️ | In reply to @mattsturg:matrix.org There's some precedent for this already: paths and derivations are stringified when used with string interpolation. AFAIK most languages that have string formatting and/or string interpolation automatically stringify non-string values? I get why you may want concatenation to be explicit about the type, but interpolation feels different 🤔 in particular interpolation for integers, which should be very easy to do | 22:55:19 |
28 Jul 2024 |
Kamilla 'ova | Hi, can someone explain this behavior? | 18:54:00 |
Kamilla 'ova | Download image.png | 18:54:08 |
emily | oh boy | 19:16:32 |
emily | that's not the only platform divergence, try builtins.split "" 🙃 | 19:16:49 |
emily | but this might be a new one | 19:16:57 |
emily | you might want to report it upstream | 19:47:21 |
29 Jul 2024 |
| andmuz joined the room. | 00:49:46 |
| @rayne:spooky.computer left the room. | 03:38:31 |
| @kenzie:matrix.kenzi.dev left the room. | 06:57:49 |
| Kodin joined the room. | 07:04:18 |
| @mariosangiorgio:matrix.org left the room. | 07:21:39 |
| Travis joined the room. | 15:04:04 |
| @minec:ins4.xyz joined the room. | 16:41:04 |
infinisil | Neat find! | 23:10:50 |
30 Jul 2024 |
quapka4 | Hi folks, let's say I am building a derivation that depends on many pkgs and I wanna be able to build the final derivation with various versions of the dependencies. What is a clean way to do it? I was thinking something like:
builder = { pkg1 ? { version = null; hash = null;} pkg2 ? { version = null; hash = null; ... }: {
...
}
| 09:08:44 |