| 16 Jul 2024 |
|  will joined the room. | 04:51:11 |
|  Torsten Boettjer joined the room. | 07:35:43 |
|  @thobys:inpt.fr left the room. | 10:33:55 |
|  Marius changed their display name from Burrito (Marius) to Marius. | 12:22:13 |
|  bnesbitt joined the room. | 12:39:39 |
|  @tormod.hellen:matrix.org left the room. | 20:04:54 |
|  @judson:matrix.org left the room. | 21:33:03 |
|  @alex3829:matrix.org left the room. | 23:17:03 |
| 17 Jul 2024 |
|  meetm left the room. | 04:36:58 |
|  hlad joined the room. | 10:45:44 |
| 18 Jul 2024 |
|  tewi 🏳️⚧️ joined the room. | 00:23:43 |
|  feel_stool joined the room. | 16:14:57 |
|  Trenton VanderWert joined the room. | 23:04:22 |
| tewi 🏳️⚧️ changed their profile picture. | 23:50:52 |
| tewi 🏳️⚧️ removed their profile picture. | 23:52:42 |
| tewi 🏳️⚧️ set a profile picture. | 23:53:18 |
| 19 Jul 2024 |
|  C0deboy joined the room. | 04:19:13 |
|  usor joined the room. | 13:02:23 |
|  easel changed their profile picture. | 14:17:24 |
 Traxys | By any chance is there a way to know the git branch in a flake? I need to generate a package differently if it's from the main branch vs a stable branch (mostly links to the corresponding branch) | 18:04:40 |
 tomberek | No. Because branches are mutable over time, this would allow you to have two different outcomes over time for the same commit. The way to do this would be to run a packaging script prior to your build that would add the branch name into a file of the flake, then running a "dirty" build. | 18:36:28 |
|  Duanin2 joined the room. | 18:47:02 |
 Matt Sturgeon | Or alternatively (since I assume you mean a branched off release) define the "release name" in a file/variable/whatever (committed to the repo) | 19:20:19 |
 Gaétan Lepage | This is what is being done in nixpkgs I think | 19:35:44 |
| Matt Sturgeon | In reply to @glepage:matrix.org
This is what is being done in nixpkgs I think Yes they have lib.release or something similarly named | 19:49:28 |
| Matt Sturgeon | * Yes they have lib.release or something similarly named, which just a string literal defined somewhere | 19:50:07 |
| Matt Sturgeon | * Yes they have `lib.release` or something similarly named, which just a string literal defined somewhere | 19:50:16 |
 Cathal OGrady | can I have a thin nix shell that does not dowload gcc coreutils etc ? | 23:09:45 |
