16 Jul 2024 |
| will joined the room. | 04:51:11 |
| Torsten Boettjer joined the room. | 07:35:43 |
| @thobys:inpt.fr left the room. | 10:33:55 |
| Marius changed their display name from Burrito (Marius) to Marius. | 12:22:13 |
| bnesbitt joined the room. | 12:39:39 |
| @tormod.hellen:matrix.org left the room. | 20:04:54 |
| @judson:matrix.org left the room. | 21:33:03 |
| @alex3829:matrix.org left the room. | 23:17:03 |
17 Jul 2024 |
| meetm left the room. | 04:36:58 |
| hlad joined the room. | 10:45:44 |
18 Jul 2024 |
| tewi 🏳️⚧️ joined the room. | 00:23:43 |
| feel_stool joined the room. | 16:14:57 |
| Trenton VanderWert joined the room. | 23:04:22 |
| tewi 🏳️⚧️ changed their profile picture. | 23:50:52 |
| tewi 🏳️⚧️ removed their profile picture. | 23:52:42 |
| tewi 🏳️⚧️ set a profile picture. | 23:53:18 |
19 Jul 2024 |
| C0deboy joined the room. | 04:19:13 |
| usor joined the room. | 13:02:23 |
| easel changed their profile picture. | 14:17:24 |
Traxys | By any chance is there a way to know the git branch in a flake? I need to generate a package differently if it's from the main branch vs a stable branch (mostly links to the corresponding branch) | 18:04:40 |
tomberek | No. Because branches are mutable over time, this would allow you to have two different outcomes over time for the same commit. The way to do this would be to run a packaging script prior to your build that would add the branch name into a file of the flake, then running a "dirty" build. | 18:36:28 |
| Duanin2 joined the room. | 18:47:02 |
Matt Sturgeon | Or alternatively (since I assume you mean a branched off release) define the "release name" in a file/variable/whatever (committed to the repo) | 19:20:19 |
Gaétan Lepage | This is what is being done in nixpkgs I think | 19:35:44 |
Matt Sturgeon | In reply to @glepage:matrix.org This is what is being done in nixpkgs I think Yes they have lib.release or something similarly named | 19:49:28 |
Matt Sturgeon | * Yes they have lib.release or something similarly named, which just a string literal defined somewhere | 19:50:07 |
Matt Sturgeon | * Yes they have `lib.release` or something similarly named, which just a string literal defined somewhere | 19:50:16 |
Cathal OGrady | can I have a thin nix shell that does not dowload gcc coreutils etc ? | 23:09:45 |