Nix Language | 1943 Members | |
| Nix programming language | 359 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Jun 2021 | ||
very cool, nix-eval-parser could have very many uses in the nix ecosystem | 19:59:20 | |
* very cool, nix-eval-parser could have quite a few uses in the nix ecosystem | 19:59:32 | |
In reply to @andrew:mtx.rew.laLike nix-eval-lsp but as a Rust crate? | 20:05:27 | |
| I was thinking things like an incremental evaluator, great debugging tool | 20:05:58 | |
| Either way, yeah I'm excited to see what stuff is now possible. I look forward to seeing what happens with https://github.com/nix-community/rnix-lsp/pull/38 | 20:06:22 | |
In reply to @andrew:mtx.rew.laThat would be great | 20:06:38 | |
| Surely this means we're not that far off being able to rewrite the whole of nix in Rust? 😜 | 20:11:37 | |
aaronjanse: I hope they review it. Otherwise it might make sense to just merge rnix-lsp in | 20:11:52 | |
| 21:13:06 | ||
| 22:52:46 | ||
| 12 Jun 2021 | ||
| aaronjanse: we could definitely use the evaluation for nixpkgs-hammering | 12:46:38 | |
| 13 Jun 2021 | ||
| 03:31:24 | ||
hm, { foo ? bar } @ args: doesn't reflect the default value in args.foo, is that a feature? | 16:40:42 | |
| I think that's intentional, although I'm not sure if everyone agrees on whether it's a feature :P | 16:45:35 | |
| yeah i guess both choices are equally valid | 16:46:18 | |
| 23:26:59 | ||
| 14 Jun 2021 | ||
| 01:20:06 | ||
| 01:22:10 | ||
| 02:41:40 | ||
| 12:32:39 | ||
| 20:10:26 | ||
| hey, can someone put a icon for this room | 20:16:01 | |
| 15 Jun 2021 | ||
| 03:47:32 | ||
| aaronjanse: would you be willing to share your rust debug trace for when your language client initializes requests the definition of
| 18:40:51 | |
| * aaronjanse: would you be willing to share your rust debug trace for when your language client initializes requests the definition of
| 18:41:15 | |
| Oh! | 18:41:27 | |
| The PR to rnix-lsp doesn't have goto definition enabled | 18:41:40 | |
| ah ok | 18:41:57 | |
| Oh gosh sorry that must have been terribly confusing | 18:42:04 | |
| nah, I should have read more closely, "Using the evaluator for completions and goto-definition would similarly require very little modification to main.rs. " | 18:43:20 | |