!tPxtoBdChSsxHuBlNW:nixos.org

NixOS Marketing

266 Members
NixOS website + marketing team: https://nixos.org/community/teams/marketing.html57 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
27 Nov 2024
@crertel:matrix.orgcrertelah, okay, so there's that at least! silver linings!02:23:42
@hexa:lossy.networkhexait costs money, do it sooner rather than later, before amazon stops sponsoring part of the bill02:24:01
@crertel:matrix.orgcrertelthe current best solution for that is glacier for old stuff and a sort of general garbage collect, or did I read the wrong thing?02:24:55
@hexa:lossy.networkhexayeah02:26:24
@hexa:lossy.networkhexagc paths that are unreachable from channels02:26:39
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaand put the rest into glacier02:26:45
@crertel:matrix.orgcrertelalright, I'll bug about schleuger then some other time...sounds like y'all got your hands full.02:28:25
@crertel:matrix.orgcrertel but, you had mentioned kinda that maybe security@ could be helpful another way? 02:28:39
@crertel:matrix.orgcrertel*schleuder02:29:19
@hexa:lossy.networkhexayeah, like … reach out to security@nixos.org, or individually to these contacts, if you require encyrption02:29:23
@hexa:lossy.networkhexacould be what we advise to do02:29:35
@crertel:matrix.orgcrertelthat'd be perfect!02:29:57
@crertel:matrix.orgcrertel"I need to report a security issue but don't need encryption?" "Email security@" "I need to report an issue but need encryption" "Email one of these fine folks:"02:30:35
@crertel:matrix.orgcrertelI need to drop for the night, but thanks for the help.02:36:13
@raboof:matrix.orgraboof
In reply to @crertel:matrix.org
And then another question...looking at the github, I see a label for "status:wait-for-upstream"...is that for "there's nothing we as packagers can do on this except wait for the package to fix it"?
or contribute upstream, of course, usually - though I don't know what particular issue this was talking about
09:30:03
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilThis would be worth shouting out on socials: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nix-formatting-team-treewide-nixpkgs-formatting/56666 :)10:59:25
@tomberek:matrix.orgtomberek

For socials:

Reminder that PlanetNix (https://planetnix.com/) Call for Papers (https://sessionize.com/planet-nix-2025/) is still open, but closes Dec 9th.

18:02:59
29 Nov 2024
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan RossSaturday looks like it might be the day we get 24.11 releasing. Would be good for socials to have things ready to go.03:47:50
@tomberek:matrix.orgtomberekOkay. I was able to get access and start scheduling things. Let me know.16:30:35
@tomberek:matrix.orgtomberek Thanks raboof ! I got access and put it into the vault. Started scheduling a few things. 16:32:48
@lassulus:lassul.uslassulus changed their profile picture.18:30:22
30 Nov 2024
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan RossDo we want to share https://nixos.org/blog/announcements/2024/nixos-2411/ on the socials or the Discourse post when I get to making it?18:31:45
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa tomberek: ^ 18:34:05
@tomberek:matrix.orgtomberekYep, on it.19:05:21
@paperdigits:matrix.orgmicahttps://nixos.org/manual/nixos/stable/release-notes#sec-release-24.11 the "release date" says "2024.11.??" I don't know if anyone here can fix that ;)19:48:51
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan Ross
In reply to @paperdigits:matrix.org
https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/stable/release-notes#sec-release-24.11 the "release date" says "2024.11.??" I don't know if anyone here can fix that ;)
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/nixos-24.11/nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2411.section.md hasn't rolled into nixos-24.11 branch + homepage repo will need an update.
20:13:58
1 Dec 2024
@avocadoom:avocadoom.deavocadoomI'd appreciate any feedback on this https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-homepage/pull/159919:12:03
11 Dec 2024
@drupol:matrix.orgPol joined the room.08:24:18
@drupol:matrix.orgPol thilobillerbeck (avocadoom): this commit https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-homepage/commit/79d0bdfba15d68c000aa73c11beb953bb1d7bc15, what's preventing it from being published? 08:24:59
@avocadoom:avocadoom.deavocadoomAs explained in your PR, the CI ran through successfully https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-homepage/actions/runs/12240419589 and thus your changes are live. What exactly makes you think it did not succeed? Which part or element did you want to change that seems to not have been affected?16:28:43

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6