!tPxtoBdChSsxHuBlNW:nixos.org

NixOS Marketing

262 Members
NixOS website + marketing team: https://nixos.org/community/teams/marketing.html58 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
26 Jan 2024
@hexa:lossy.networkhexamjolnir is an account on :nixos.org, that is controlled by the moderation team, but the infra team has its credentials as well, so we are kinda saf16:09:08
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa * mjolnir is an account on :nixos.org, that is controlled by the moderation team, but the infra team has its credentials as well, so we are kinda safe16:09:09
27 Jan 2024
@seano108:matrix.orgseano108 joined the room.10:18:10
28 Jan 2024
@ncfavier:matrix.orgncfavier changed their profile picture.14:04:07
30 Jan 2024
@mberger-:matrix.orgMathias joined the room.14:54:24
@mberger-:matrix.orgMathiasnixhomepage.png
Download nixhomepage.png
15:43:09
@mberger-:matrix.orgMathiasHello everyone! I am not a designer, but I tried redesigning the homepage using a new stack (Astro + Tailwind) the other day. It could definitely be better, but what are your thoughts? Maybe I could work on it more if you like it. Have a nice day!15:43:11
@avocadoom:avocadoom.deavocadoom Hi Mathias thanks for your submission. Looking at the repo you may have noticed we are already in the process of reworking the homepage by porting existing parts over to Astro which is nearly finished. I think at some point we will start to incorporate a redesign, but currently we are more focussed on improving the existing things. Feel free to join the marketing meetings to get in touch. :) 15:54:39
@avocadoom:avocadoom.deavocadoomsee https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-homepage/issues/112515:55:31
@avocadoom:avocadoom.deavocadoomand https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-homepage/tree/main15:55:40
@mberger-:matrix.orgMathiasYeah, I completely understand. I saw you were moving to Astro. That's why I just wanted to try designing a new version for fun with the new stack. But I know you were not planning to change the design for now16:14:28
@kranzes:matrix.org@kranzes:matrix.orgIs there a need for a redesign?18:21:53
@kranzes:matrix.org@kranzes:matrix.orgI personally like the current design.18:22:02
@mberger-:matrix.orgMathiasI think there are some parts of the website that could be improved imo. For instance, the contrast ratio on the buttons of the homepage is really poor in the current version, and a dark theme would be a nice too18:49:23
@avocadoom:avocadoom.deavocadoom
In reply to @mberger-:matrix.org
I think there are some parts of the website that could be improved imo. For instance, the contrast ratio on the buttons of the homepage is really poor in the current version, and a dark theme would be a nice too
At least Button contrast ist on the To-Do list. A dark mode is a consideration
18:54:10
@avocadoom:avocadoom.deavocadoom* At least Button contrast is on the To-Do list. A dark mode is a consideration18:54:23
@avocadoom:avocadoom.deavocadoomBut I want part 1 to be fully finished before we move on 18:55:27
@avocadoom:avocadoom.deavocadoomIf things are mixed up, then we'll get nowhere with this18:55:47
@mberger-:matrix.orgMathiasDumb question, but why would this go nowhere? Wouldn't it be more efficient to implement redesign changes while transitioning stacks, as opposed to changing the stack first and then making the redesign changes?19:04:35
@avocadoom:avocadoom.deavocadoomNot really as introducing design changes at least in my opinion is not just "lets make another PR" but requires discussions and planning, thus lengthening the development time for changes to be released. Additionally, introducing design changes to the PRs in addition to technical changes, to be more specific changing the stack, doubles review time at a minimum since now additionally to reviewing the code quality and structure, now a UI/UX review has to be done. 19:13:28
@avocadoom:avocadoom.deavocadoom Since we dont want development cycles to take an "eternity" and to be more quick in a relative sense jonge garbas and me agreed on doing things step by step back in december and this is clearly stated in the issue I linked. 19:14:47
@avocadoom:avocadoom.deavocadoom * Since we dont want development cycles to take an "eternity" and to be more quick in a relative sense jonge garbas and me agreed on doing things step by step back in september and this is clearly stated in the issue I linked. 19:16:42
@avocadoom:avocadoom.deavocadoomRedacted or Malformed Event19:17:07
@mberger-:matrix.orgMathiasYeah yeah, that was just out of curiosity. Sorry for the question19:27:15
@avocadoom:avocadoom.deavocadoomYou don't have to be sorry, it's absolutely fine to ask those questions :D sorry if my answer has been a bit harsh 19:51:37
31 Jan 2024
@avocadoom:avocadoom.deavocadoomBut to get this thing rolling again anyway, I finished some branches up and did the remaining demo work on the landing page so we can move on to phase 2 :)01:26:13
@avocadoom:avocadoom.deavocadoomunforunately we still need some kind of script which selectively generates the doc pages that are not handled by Astro, maybe we can figure something out in the call01:26:47
@federicodschonborn:matrix.org@federicodschonborn:matrix.org changed their profile picture.03:36:35
@federicodschonborn:matrix.org@federicodschonborn:matrix.org changed their profile picture.06:22:11
@hexa:lossy.networkhexahttps://discourse.nixos.org/t/upcoming-garbage-collection-for-cache-nixos-org/3907816:16:43

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6