Sender | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
23 May 2025 | ||
I don't want the website to be the source of truth for that | 21:09:37 | |
Yeah, but should it be https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NixOS/nixos-artwork/master/logo/nixos.svg (like I'm using in the PR) for profiting from future improvements to the SVG, or https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NixOS/nixos-artwork/a1dc097cbb3407233ed731eef3d4daa3b7e2d121/logo/nixos.svg so that it doesn't break if stuff gets moved around in nixos-artwork? | 21:12:36 | |
* Yeah, but should it be https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NixOS/nixos-artwork/master/logo/nixos.svg (like I'm using in the PR) for profiting from future improvements to the SVG, or https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NixOS/nixos-artwork/a1dc097cbb3407233ed731eef3d4daa3b7e2d121/logo/nixos.svg so that it won't break if stuff gets moved around in nixos-artwork? | 21:13:25 | |
Hmm, I dont know what @djacu:matrix.org: s plans are for filepath stability tbh. | 21:22:50 | |
Whatever fixes the issue is fine for now. But this does give me something to think about. The branding repo will have no logo files committed; everything is built from source. However, there will be releases. Using | 21:46:25 | |
Whata about deploying the files to something like artwork.nixos.org? | 21:54:59 | |
Yeah this is the right solution. Duh 🤦 | 21:56:20 | |
This could be used in a similar style to a cdn | 21:58:09 | |
I was planning on having a media kit page anyway. With all the external logos and instructions. | 21:58:10 | |
So, for now, do we revert to nixos-artwork or upload to nixos.org again? | 22:00:14 | |
(since the artwork subdomain and the branding repo is a long-term solution) | 22:00:56 | |
I wouldn't rely on nixos.org being stable even short term. We are discussing changes to the website that could land before I finish branding v0. I would consider nixos-artwork more stable. | 22:02:08 | |
Reverting nixos-artwork to what? It's a change on nixos.org that broke the Nixpkgs README. | 22:02:10 | |
Oh, sorry, didn't see the "to". | 22:02:36 | |
* Oh, sorry, didn't see the "to" in "revert to nixos-artwork" | 22:03:25 | |
* | 22:03:39 | |
* I wouldn't rely on nixos.org being stable in the short term. We are discussing changes to the website that could land before I finish branding v0. I would consider nixos-artwork more stable. | 22:06:48 | |
well waiting a bit, to see if someone yells to not merge the hotfix 👀 | 22:07:30 | |
25 May 2025 | ||
NixCon ticket sales are open! https://discourse.nixos.org/t/ticket-sales-started-for-nixcon-2025/64756 | 15:33:25 | |
26 May 2025 | ||
13:15:22 | ||
27 May 2025 | ||
14:45:43 | ||
15:24:41 | ||
29 May 2025 | ||
04:47:29 | ||
hej you all, thilobillerbeck (avocadoom) you merged a NixCon ticket sale announcement as the top banner on nixos.org two days after the 25.05 release announcement. I noticed because I had trouble finding the release notes. I guess few people know that you need to click "Blog", on the entry, etc. (as a helping hand at NixCon) I do understand the importance of selling tickets. but just two days for the release announcement is a bit troublesome because users might miss it (especially regarding our brief EOL timeframe). also as a release manager I would feel kinda disrespected. could we discuss possible solutions to this problem? https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-homepage/commit/95a7c1f2e0588cb2b2fe9bf877dea585031d1b3a | 04:50:47 | |
* hej you all, thilobillerbeck (avocadoom) you merged a NixCon ticket sale announcement as the top banner on nixos.org two days after the 25.05 release announcement. I noticed because I had trouble finding the release notes. I guess few people know that you need to click "Blog", on the entry, etc. (as a helping hand at NixCon) I do understand the importance of selling tickets. but just two days for the release announcement is a bit troublesome because users might miss it (especially regarding our brief EOL timeframe). if I were a release manager I would feel kinda disrespected. could we discuss possible solutions to this problem? https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-homepage/commit/95a7c1f2e0588cb2b2fe9bf877dea585031d1b3a | 04:51:13 | |
cc IdaBzo | 08:27:23 | |
I'd propose working on multiple banners at the same time, if wanted and possible :) | 08:33:47 | |
In reply to @lennart:0520.chWe need to find another solution for that. Having multiple banners will create a horrible UI and UX since it'll result in a lot of noise. | 09:40:59 | |
Banners are there to grab attention on their own. With every new one, the effect will be drastically reduced and just create a stack of mess and noise for the end user. | 09:42:51 | |
If you don't feel the need for the banner to be there I can take it down. | 09:43:42 |