NixOS Marketing | 260 Members | |
| NixOS website + marketing team: https://nixos.org/community/teams/marketing.html | 56 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Mar 2024 | ||
In reply to @idabzo:matrix.orgYes, that would be great | 21:46:28 | |
| djacu: tomberek: one thing I forgot was we should write a shorter post about the Scale + NixCon NA, nothing long just some text with few pictures. I'll start it in a PR but I would need pictures since I only have one :) | 21:48:00 | |
| 28 Mar 2024 | ||
In reply to @garbas:matrix.orgSome pictures have been gathered here. https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nixcon-na-photos/41770 | 02:28:54 | |
In reply to @tomberek:matrix.orgI merged this and an improving on it now. Got some good links from the EFF. | 02:47:20 | |
In reply to @djacu:matrix.orghttps://github.com/NixOS/marketing/pull/3 | 05:28:58 | |
| 29 Mar 2024 | ||
| What is the current state and usage of the NixOS Twitter account? | 11:08:37 | |
| The Twitter/x Account is as far as i know played out to from Buffer as the other accounts are too. It is on par with the rest of the accounts content wise. Or what kind of state or usage does your question refer to? | 11:52:46 | |
| Yes that answers my question | 12:30:14 | |
| Twitter has increasingly become enshittified, with login walls everywhere and even killing Nitter as the last workaround. Do we still want to keep providing value to that network by posting content on it? | 12:31:16 | |
| I mean, imo. it's no extra effort atm. but since IdaBzo is responsible, I tag her :D | 12:33:13 | |
In reply to @piegames:matrix.orgyes we will still keep pushing updated to as many platforms as we can. including twitter. | 15:41:13 | |
In reply to @piegames:matrix.org* yes we will still keep pushing social updates to as many platforms as we can. including twitter. | 15:42:40 | |
| 31 Mar 2024 | ||
| 23:07:53 | ||
| 1 Apr 2024 | ||
| I migrated all our passwords to vault.nixos.org, and sent you all invites. I'll be decomissioning the old instance immediately to reduce our costs, hope that's alright. | 13:07:24 | |
| btw, I can't help but notice the 👎️ on garba's reply. Please don't do that. It doesn't help change people's opinions and generally creates an atmosphere where people drive-by up/down vote and is demoralizing to the people actually doing the things. We can disagree while still being respectful to each other. | 13:52:09 | |
| Jonas Chevalier while I understand your point, I'd like to point out that this is not about having a debate or changing people's minds. Sometimes it's just about agreeing to disagree | 14:07:35 | |
| It's fine to disagree. But what does it add to the conversation? If you treat it as a datapoint, it's not actionable. All it does is create this looming sense that a few people disagreed. It doesn't tell us how informed those people are and how they are putting this decision in context with the number of followers that would be lost, for example. | 14:27:13 | |
| maybe I'm just grumpy :p | 15:56:32 | |
| What's the alternative to express disagreement? Pile on "noes"? Send PRs to remove Twitter involvement and do the consensus over there? I feel like those reactions are just the easiest way to express minor disagreements with no further action | 16:01:34 | |
| but to clarify: should I perform as usual and post all the messages on LinkedIn, Mastodon, and Twitter as well? It's just a disagreement, not a comment to proceed? | 16:56:49 | |
| I actually appreciate Jonas message, a thumbs down is not something parsed easily, when catching up with a room and not really helpful for the person trying to get a response. Personally I would welcome disagreement with a reason a lot more than plain disagreement. From a marketing perspective I do still see value in posting to twitter so I would argue for keep thing like they are right now, if it's not a lot of time investment. | 17:15:34 | |
In reply to @fritz.otlinghaus:helsinki-systems.deRegarding time investment, we use a social media management tool, afaik posting to Twitter is just toggling the "post to Twitter" switch. | 17:46:15 | |
In reply to @avocadoom:avocadoom.deyes, exactly, I'm even using the same graphic design across all the channels | 18:16:02 | |
In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org I would say don't use alternatives. I agree with the general sentiment that negative emojis like 👎️ do not help the atmosphere, creates friction between us, and can be confusing. If you disagree, say so. Say why. Be pointed. Be direct. | 19:23:06 | |
| the disagreement has been said though ^ | 19:23:43 | |
| 2 Apr 2024 | ||
| Then just leave it at that. | 03:00:33 | |
| 06:56:48 | ||
| 07:35:04 | ||
| yes, please proceed as usual. Thank you! | 07:43:53 | |