| 12 Feb 2025 |
 djacu | * Overall, I'm in favor of the migration of this page to a repository as the addition/removal of a company from the website should be an SC decision.
I had thoughts, but now I have more questions than thoughts. And I think answering some of these questions can help shape what the repository looks like.
- What companies is this repository for?
The commercial support page is for companies offering some sort of Nix support/teaching/consulting. In contrast, the haskell-companies repository appears to be any company that uses Haskell. Antithesis isn't on the commercial support site but they most certainly use Nix. Should they be in the repository? 🤷
- Where should this repository live?
Two possibilities I have thought of are:
- It could either be a
nix-companies repository under the nixos organization.
- An entirely new
nix-companies organization.
The second feels less official and more community driven.
- Who owns this new repository/organization?
No thoughts yet.
| 05:18:07 |
| djacu | A lot of these companies have and/or continue to contribute a lot to the project. I think the haskell-companies repo is a great idea but I think the table looks terrible. I think we can do a bit better with something like the following.
<company logo>
# Company Name
A short blurb about the company similar to what is on the commercial support site now.
### Locations
- Location 1
- Location n
### Services
- Service 1
- Service n
### Links
- Link 1
- Link n
### Other? | 05:22:25 |
| djacu | * A lot of these companies have and/or continue to contribute a lot to the project. I think the haskell-companies repo is a great idea but I think the table looks terrible. I think we can do a bit better with something like the following.
<company logo>
Company Name
A short blurb about the company similar to what is on the commercial support site now.
Locations
Services
Links
Other?
| 05:22:40 |
| djacu | * A lot of these companies have and/or continue to contribute a lot to the project. I think the haskell-companies repo is a great idea but I think the table looks terrible. I think we can do a bit better with something like the following.
(The company logo 256px tall by however many pixels wide)
Company Name
A short blurb about the company similar to what is on the commercial support site now.
Locations
Services
Links
Other?
| 05:23:32 |
| 13 Feb 2025 |
|  connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) changed their display name from connor (he/him) (UTC-7) to connor (he/him) (UTC-8). | 06:59:17 |
 raboof | I agree having outdated/inactive orgs in there is bad. I'm not sure I see how moving the page elsewhere helps, though - I found it fairly easy to update, and we'd (collectively) want to make sure it's up-to-date even if it's elsewhere. Most updates should be uncontroversial so while I suppose the SC should have the final word I'm not sure we should put them in the critical path. | 08:23:15 |
| raboof | I can do a pass over the page and create issues / ping people / fix stuff that seems outdated | 08:23:57 |
| raboof | found 2 wrong links and 1 wrong logo, pinged people. I didn't see obvious signs that orgs were no longer active, do you know of any? | 09:10:44 |
 avocadoom | One more concern that I have is that we have the logo section under /donate which is to my understanding for partners and we have this page where people do not pay anything. While this is fine for me, I wondered if this raised any concern with partmers. | 11:17:21 |
| 15 Feb 2025 |
|  BenjB83 joined the room. | 10:20:31 |
| BenjB83 changed their display name from Benjamín Buske to BenjB83. | 10:43:30 |
