| 9 Mar 2024 |
 Steven Keuchel | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/294508 | 14:34:37 |
| 10 Mar 2024 |
 Pratham Patel | there isn't even a binary cache afaik | 14:11:33 |
 hexa | there is no plausible build hardware yet | 15:48:30 |
 raitobezarius | We wanted to build a community cluster made out of SBCs | 15:48:59 |
 @5m5z3q888q5prxkg:chat.lightnovel-dungeon.de | ERROR: tests/cp/proc-short-read
===============================
cp: skipping file '/proc/cpuinfo', as it was replaced while being copied
sed: can't read 1: No such file or directory
proc-short-read.sh: set-up failure:
ERROR tests/cp/proc-short-read.sh (exit status: 99)
Seems that coreutils are failing to build through qemu x86_64-linux -> riscv64-linux
| 17:03:58 |
| raitobezarius | But a lot of code was in suboptimal state to have a realistic cluster AFAIK | 15:49:13 |
| raitobezarius | I am still interested to build one | 15:49:20 |
| raitobezarius | But maybe we should define a core set of packages | 15:49:27 |
| Pratham Patel | The VisionFive2, though having the same cores as the HiFive Unmatched, has come uarch improvements (kinda like a "v2" of the core), making it a bit faster for compilation. But gets severely hindered by half the RAM (8) compared to what you get on the Unmatched (16). | 15:50:25 |
| raitobezarius | I'd not say that RAM is the biggest deal tbf | 15:51:04 |
| raitobezarius | You can eval nixpkgs on a x86 | 15:51:09 |
| Pratham Patel | Not the biggest, but is a pain point tbh | 15:51:19 |
| raitobezarius | For what exactly? | 15:51:28 |
| Pratham Patel | and no PCIe support yet (patches sent, getting merged and might be in 6.10), so can't use swap that "well" | 15:52:32 |
| raitobezarius | Yeah I have seen the PCIe circus | 15:54:22 |
| raitobezarius | That's my biggest annoyance | 15:54:29 |
| raitobezarius | Because NVMe for builders would be very nice | 15:54:43 |
| Pratham Patel | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
For what exactly? well, fedora packaging might be crazy but something this insane might've been a need
https://matrix.to/#/!GhnNOKFLyvWBmnjqRS:fedoraproject.org/$C8oSRQ2RM6rpaAjTQpshPYtYs1bXbMRlXWIUdcT648A?via=fedoraproject.org&via=fedora.im&via=matrix.org | 15:54:45 |
| raitobezarius | I'd be curious which package is this one | 15:55:36 |
| raitobezarius | I wonder if this is not just a spec for speed reason rather than actual requirement, e.g. chromium linkage | 15:55:56 |
| Pratham Patel | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
Because NVMe for builders would be very nice highly agree, but no idea how nice
AFAIK, the U74 is equivalent to A55 (correct me if I'm wrong) and haven't used an NVMe on it yet. On my RK3588, I saw a literal 100% improvement in building a defconfig kernel from the NVMe compared to when the source was on the SD Card
| 15:57:05 |
| Pratham Patel | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
I'd be curious which package is this one I'm not even kidding, I'm too scared to look | 15:57:21 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @thefossguy:matrix.org
highly agree, but no idea how nice
AFAIK, the U74 is equivalent to A55 (correct me if I'm wrong) and haven't used an NVMe on it yet. On my RK3588, I saw a literal 100% improvement in building a defconfig kernel from the NVMe compared to when the source was on the SD Card Not really surprised | 15:57:42 |
| Pratham Patel | the halving was surprising for me though, I knew it would be better, but didn't know that it would be by this much! | 15:58:11 |
| Steven Keuchel | is that with system or user mode emulation? | 17:08:58 |
 Alex | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
I'd not say that RAM is the biggest deal tbf It is necessary for certain packages.
(e.g. the Zig compiler, unless that's now been updated to a less memory-intensive version?) | 17:14:20 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @alex:tunstall.xyz
It is necessary for certain packages.
(e.g. the Zig compiler, unless that's now been updated to a less memory-intensive version?) how much RAM the Zig compiler take in your experience? | 17:17:03 |
| * @5m5z3q888q5prxkg:chat.lightnovel-dungeon.de submitted https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/294775 | Build failure: coreutils (riscv64-linux)
| 17:16:32 |
| raitobezarius | just to have a rough idea | 17:17:06 |
| @5m5z3q888q5prxkg:chat.lightnovel-dungeon.de | https://github.com/misuzu/nixos-vf2/blob/master/flake.nix#L3 Is this binary cache usable? | 17:19:33 |
