| 8 Mar 2024 |
 Alex | Apparently the latest RVK spec does not mention SM2 support... How suspicious. | 17:52:15 |
 Steven Keuchel | a lot of them were ratified at the same time as RVV | 17:53:52 |
| 10 Mar 2024 |
 KREYREN ⚡️🦀 (TH1520 in Licheepi 4A) | is there an UEFI RISCV64 installer with GNOME somewhere? | 03:16:04 |
| 8 Mar 2024 |
| Steven Keuchel | Nov'21? | 17:54:00 |
| 10 Mar 2024 |
| KREYREN ⚡️🦀 (TH1520 in Licheepi 4A) | guess i will have to build one then x-x | 03:29:41 |
| 8 Mar 2024 |
| Steven Keuchel | not the recent vector crypto tho | 17:54:32 |
| Steven Keuchel | Hmm the diagram shows "Security" with "AES/RSA/SHA2" separate from the cores.
https://docs.banana-pi.org/bpi-f3/bpi-f3_sch.png | 17:59:28 |
| Steven Keuchel | So I guess exposed as IO, not as part of the ISA | 17:59:45 |
| Steven Keuchel | :( | 17:59:53 |
| 9 Mar 2024 |
 Pratham Patel (you can mention me) | I don't see a mention of ISA extensions (the entire string) other than the mention of RVV 1.0 | 02:49:48 |
| Pratham Patel (you can mention me) | So most of it is probably under an NDA until the product is ready for mass promotion | 02:50:09 |
| Steven Keuchel | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/294508 | 14:34:37 |
| 10 Mar 2024 |
| Pratham Patel (you can mention me) | there isn't even a binary cache afaik | 14:11:33 |
 hexa | there is no plausible build hardware yet | 15:48:30 |
 raitobezarius | We wanted to build a community cluster made out of SBCs | 15:48:59 |
| KREYREN ⚡️🦀 (TH1520 in Licheepi 4A) | ERROR: tests/cp/proc-short-read
===============================
cp: skipping file '/proc/cpuinfo', as it was replaced while being copied
sed: can't read 1: No such file or directory
proc-short-read.sh: set-up failure:
ERROR tests/cp/proc-short-read.sh (exit status: 99)
Seems that coreutils are failing to build through qemu x86_64-linux -> riscv64-linux
| 17:03:58 |
| raitobezarius | But a lot of code was in suboptimal state to have a realistic cluster AFAIK | 15:49:13 |
| raitobezarius | I am still interested to build one | 15:49:20 |
| raitobezarius | But maybe we should define a core set of packages | 15:49:27 |
| Pratham Patel (you can mention me) | The VisionFive2, though having the same cores as the HiFive Unmatched, has come uarch improvements (kinda like a "v2" of the core), making it a bit faster for compilation. But gets severely hindered by half the RAM (8) compared to what you get on the Unmatched (16). | 15:50:25 |
| raitobezarius | I'd not say that RAM is the biggest deal tbf | 15:51:04 |
| raitobezarius | You can eval nixpkgs on a x86 | 15:51:09 |
| Pratham Patel (you can mention me) | Not the biggest, but is a pain point tbh | 15:51:19 |
| raitobezarius | For what exactly? | 15:51:28 |
| Pratham Patel (you can mention me) | and no PCIe support yet (patches sent, getting merged and might be in 6.10), so can't use swap that "well" | 15:52:32 |
| raitobezarius | Yeah I have seen the PCIe circus | 15:54:22 |
| raitobezarius | That's my biggest annoyance | 15:54:29 |
| raitobezarius | Because NVMe for builders would be very nice | 15:54:43 |
| Pratham Patel (you can mention me) | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
For what exactly? well, fedora packaging might be crazy but something this insane might've been a need
https://matrix.to/#/!GhnNOKFLyvWBmnjqRS:fedoraproject.org/$C8oSRQ2RM6rpaAjTQpshPYtYs1bXbMRlXWIUdcT648A?via=fedoraproject.org&via=fedora.im&via=matrix.org | 15:54:45 |
| raitobezarius | I'd be curious which package is this one | 15:55:36 |
