| 6 Mar 2025 |
| @jellyterra:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 13:04:46 |
| 7 Mar 2025 |
White Whale | Hello! How can I override Python package `watchdog` from within overlay? I tried this: ```nix python3Packages = super.python3Packages.overrideScope (self: super: { watchdog = super.watchdog.overrideAttrs (self: super: { doCheck = false; } }); ``` However, `nix why-depends` still shows that dependency on old `watchdog` is still in place. It shows that `werkzeug` depends on this library. In Nixpkgs I found, that `werkzeug` has `watchdog` in `nativeBuildInputs`. However, neither putting `watchdog` override in `buildPackages` nor removing the library from `nativeBuildInputs` didn’t do a trick. What else could I try? | 19:05:07 |
Alex | In reply to @SeTSeR:matrix.org Hello! How can I override Python package `watchdog` from within overlay? I tried this: ```nix python3Packages = super.python3Packages.overrideScope (self: super: { watchdog = super.watchdog.overrideAttrs (self: super: { doCheck = false; } }); ``` However, `nix why-depends` still shows that dependency on old `watchdog` is still in place. It shows that `werkzeug` depends on this library. In Nixpkgs I found, that `werkzeug` has `watchdog` in `nativeBuildInputs`. However, neither putting `watchdog` override in `buildPackages` nor removing the library from `nativeBuildInputs` didn’t do a trick. What else could I try? It might be coming from one of the other Python package sets. Maybe look at the definition of python3Packages in Nixpkgs, because I suspect that it's actually an alias for one of the other sets. | 20:48:14 |
White Whale | In reply to @alex:tunstall.xyz It might be coming from one of the other Python package sets. Maybe look at the definition of python3Packages in Nixpkgs, because I suspect that it's actually an alias for one of the other sets. It’s strange, because I had to disable tests for some other packages and such override did the trick for them. But now I see the problem more clearly: werkzeug sees the updated watchdog, but for some reason this updated watchdog still runs tests. | 21:28:52 |
Alex | In reply to @SeTSeR:matrix.org It’s strange, because I had to disable tests for some other packages and such override did the trick for them. But now I see the problem more clearly: werkzeug sees the updated watchdog, but for some reason this updated watchdog still runs tests. You're not using overridePythonAttrs. That's probably why. | 21:30:00 |
Steven Keuchel | White Whale: that's what I usually do: https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/stable/#how-to-override-a-python-package-for-all-python-versions-using-extensions | 22:36:04 |
| 8 Mar 2025 |
| vlinkz joined the room. | 08:27:44 |
| 9 Mar 2025 |
misuzu | https://liliputing.com/orange-pi-rv2-is-a-single-board-pc-with-an-8-core-risc-v-processor/ | 20:07:50 |
| Jake Hillion joined the room. | 23:41:03 |
| 12 Mar 2025 |
| @jellyterra:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 02:44:10 |
| @jellyterra:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 02:45:33 |
| 13 Mar 2025 |
| tauphi changed their display name from Li-ion to EVA. | 00:32:50 |
| tauphi changed their display name from EVA to EVA-01. | 00:34:44 |
liberodark | Hi | 08:31:03 |
liberodark | I want to use nixos lxc for specific use case. | 08:31:25 |
liberodark | Have see nix is available in riscv64 but not lxc. | 08:31:42 |
liberodark | You know a way to create one or lxc is too early for nixos on riscv64 actually ? | 08:32:31 |
liberodark | Best Regards | 08:32:36 |
Alex | In reply to @liberodark:matrix.org You know a way to create one or lxc is too early for nixos on riscv64 actually ? Have you tried compiling it? | 08:39:27 |
liberodark | I can is needed | 08:40:23 |
liberodark | Have just try to build image for now. | 08:40:38 |
liberodark | * I can if is needed | 08:40:49 |
Alex | Expect most things to require building from source. | 08:43:18 |
liberodark | Yes, I noticed that.
For example, a simple btop will require a lot of builder stuff. | 08:48:47 |
| 17 Mar 2025 |
| egrieco joined the room. | 06:47:18 |
| jappie joined the room. | 08:08:25 |
| flx joined the room. | 19:40:21 |
flx | Are there any plans to introduce RISC-V binary builds in the official NixOS caches? | 21:39:22 |
Tristan Ross | In reply to @flx-:matrix.org Are there any plans to introduce RISC-V binary builds in the official NixOS caches? Maybe in the future once hardware is more stable | 21:39:56 |
Tristan Ross | The P550 is a good option but unstable | 21:40:25 |