| 18 Feb 2025 |
 Leon | (I don't know how much frequency scaling this thing does, could thermals have an impact?) | 23:11:08 |
 Tristan Ross | That silicon is probably more mature than the one I've got | 23:11:19 |
| Tristan Ross | The VF2 is older so I wouldn't doubt the Framework being more mature | 23:11:36 |
| Tristan Ross | I've ran into some oddities in my VF2 like NIC DMA not working | 23:11:59 |
| Leon | Well they both use the JH7110 SoC, so shouldn't be much of a difference I guess. | 23:12:27 |
| Tristan Ross | Yeah but the rest of the board matters too | 23:12:45 |
| Tristan Ross | And it's possible there's different revisions | 23:12:55 |
| Leon | But it sounds like there's not yet a Hydra or something I could hook this up to? | 23:13:49 |
| Tristan Ross | Not currently | 23:13:56 |
| Tristan Ross | @matthewcroughan:defenestrate has floated the idea | 23:14:35 |
| Leon | Cool, excited to maybe build something. | 23:16:19 |
| 19 Feb 2025 |
 [0x4A6F] | I got a Milk-V Megrez waiting for me to have time working on it... | 00:01:19 |
| 21 Feb 2025 |
| Tristan Ross | procmail-riscv64-linux> Whoeaaa! This actually can't happen.
procmail-riscv64-linux> You have a look and see if you detect anything uncanny:
procmail-riscv64-linux> *******************************************************
procmail-riscv64-linux> _autotst.c: In function 'main':
procmail-riscv64-linux> _autotst.c:110:9: warning: ignoring return value of 'setgid' declared with attribute 'warn_unused_result' [-Wunused-result]
procmail-riscv64-linux> 110 | { setgid(2);
procmail-riscv64-linux> | ^~~~~~~~~
procmail-riscv64-linux> _autotst.c:114:12: warning: ignoring return value of 'setuid' declared with attribute 'warn_unused_result' [-Wunused-result]
procmail-riscv64-linux> 114 | { setuid(2);
procmail-riscv64-linux> | ^~~~~~~~~
procmail-riscv64-linux> _autotst.c:127:12: warning: ignoring return value of 'setegid' declared with attribute 'warn_unused_result' [-Wunused-result]
procmail-riscv64-linux> 127 | { setegid(groups[i]);
procmail-riscv64-linux> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
procmail-riscv64-linux> _autotst.c:145:6: warning: ignoring return value of 'chown' declared with attribute 'warn_unused_result' [-Wunused-result]
procmail-riscv64-linux> 145 | chown(argv[1],2,getegid());setuid(2); /* adjust the directory first */
procmail-riscv64-linux> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
procmail-riscv64-linux> _autotst.c:145:33: warning: ignoring return value of 'setuid' declared with attribute 'warn_unused_result' [-Wunused-result]
procmail-riscv64-linux> 145 | chown(argv[1],2,getegid());setuid(2); /* adjust the directory first */
procmail-riscv64-linux> | ^~~~~~~~~
procmail-riscv64-linux> *******************************************************
procmail-riscv64-linux> I suggest you take a look at the definition of LDFLAGS*
procmail-riscv64-linux> in the Makefile before you try make again.
procmail-riscv64-linux> make[1]: *** [Makefile:124: ../autoconf.h] Error 1
procmail-riscv64-linux> make[1]: Leaving directory '/build/procmail-3.24/src'
procmail-riscv64-linux> make: *** [Makefile:155: autoconf.h] Error 2
procmail fails to build in a funny way
| 17:49:05 |
| Tristan Ross | Looks to be the same as https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/334916 | 17:58:10 |
| 26 Feb 2025 |
|  pouspous removed their display name pouspous. | 07:36:18 |
| pouspous left the room. | 07:36:21 |
|  @niclasoverby:beeper.com joined the room. | 10:09:09 |
| 6 Mar 2025 |
|  @jellyterra:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 13:04:46 |
| 7 Mar 2025 |
 White Whale | Hello! How can I override Python package `watchdog` from within overlay? I tried this:
```nix
python3Packages = super.python3Packages.overrideScope (self: super: {
watchdog = super.watchdog.overrideAttrs (self: super: {
doCheck = false;
}
});
```
However, `nix why-depends` still shows that dependency on old `watchdog` is still in place. It shows that `werkzeug` depends on this library. In Nixpkgs I found, that `werkzeug` has `watchdog` in `nativeBuildInputs`. However, neither putting `watchdog` override in `buildPackages` nor removing the library from `nativeBuildInputs` didn’t do a trick. What else could I try? | 19:05:07 |
 Alex | In reply to @SeTSeR:matrix.org
Hello! How can I override Python package `watchdog` from within overlay? I tried this:
```nix
python3Packages = super.python3Packages.overrideScope (self: super: {
watchdog = super.watchdog.overrideAttrs (self: super: {
doCheck = false;
}
});
```
However, `nix why-depends` still shows that dependency on old `watchdog` is still in place. It shows that `werkzeug` depends on this library. In Nixpkgs I found, that `werkzeug` has `watchdog` in `nativeBuildInputs`. However, neither putting `watchdog` override in `buildPackages` nor removing the library from `nativeBuildInputs` didn’t do a trick. What else could I try? It might be coming from one of the other Python package sets. Maybe look at the definition of python3Packages in Nixpkgs, because I suspect that it's actually an alias for one of the other sets. | 20:48:14 |
| White Whale | In reply to @alex:tunstall.xyz
It might be coming from one of the other Python package sets. Maybe look at the definition of python3Packages in Nixpkgs, because I suspect that it's actually an alias for one of the other sets. It’s strange, because I had to disable tests for some other packages and such override did the trick for them. But now I see the problem more clearly: werkzeug sees the updated watchdog, but for some reason this updated watchdog still runs tests. | 21:28:52 |
| Alex | In reply to @SeTSeR:matrix.org
It’s strange, because I had to disable tests for some other packages and such override did the trick for them. But now I see the problem more clearly: werkzeug sees the updated watchdog, but for some reason this updated watchdog still runs tests. You're not using overridePythonAttrs. That's probably why. | 21:30:00 |
 Steven Keuchel | White Whale: that's what I usually do: https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/stable/#how-to-override-a-python-package-for-all-python-versions-using-extensions | 22:36:04 |
| 8 Mar 2025 |
|  vlinkz joined the room. | 08:27:44 |
| 9 Mar 2025 |
 misuzu | https://liliputing.com/orange-pi-rv2-is-a-single-board-pc-with-an-8-core-risc-v-processor/ | 20:07:50 |
|  Jake Hillion joined the room. | 23:41:03 |
| 12 Mar 2025 |
| @jellyterra:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 02:44:10 |
| @jellyterra:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 02:45:33 |
| 13 Mar 2025 |
|  tau changed their display name from Li-ion to EVA. | 00:32:50 |
| tau changed their display name from EVA to EVA-01. | 00:34:44 |
