| 18 Dec 2023 |
 fgaz | raitobezarius: will do thanks | 14:58:35 |
 nyanbinary | cache for RISC-V when ;P | 15:43:51 |
| fgaz | In reply to @niko:conduit.rs
cache for RISC-V when ;P an official one? when suitable (ie. rack-mountable) hardware is available | 16:18:20 |
| fgaz | there are a few unofficial ones already, I'll probably make one as well | 16:18:51 |
| fgaz | * an official one? when suitable (ie. rack-mountable) hardware is available, see https://pad.lassul.us/NixOS-riscv64-linux-2023-09-10# | 16:20:37 |
| nyanbinary | In reply to @fgaz:matrix.org
an official one? when suitable (ie. rack-mountable) hardware is available, see https://pad.lassul.us/NixOS-riscv64-linux-2023-09-10# https://fosstodon.org/@fedora/111540170260635226 | 16:41:17 |
| nyanbinary | I mean RISC-V is becoming more prevalent so thats good | 16:41:28 |
|  patryk4815 set a profile picture. | 17:19:17 |
| patryk4815 | Nick Cao: This fix for gcc13 is only available on staging? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/275084 | 17:19:43 |
| patryk4815 | * Nick Cao: This fix for gcc13 is only available on staging? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/275084
thanks for merging :) | 17:31:17 |
| patryk4815 | * Nick Cao: ~~This fix for gcc13 is only available on staging? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/275084 ~~
thanks for merging :) | 17:46:50 |
| patryk4815 | * Nick Cao: This fix for gcc13 is only available on staging? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/275084
thanks for merging :) | 17:47:16 |
| 19 Dec 2023 |
| fgaz | In reply to @patryk4815:matrix.org
Nick Cao: This fix for gcc13 is only available on staging? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/275084
thanks for merging :) It's on master, not staging, and it has yet to reach the channels | 09:24:22 |
 pouspous | once https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/274853 we'll be able to fully cross-compile nixos-star64 and thus remove lib.optionals (stdenv.buildPlatform == stdenv.hostPlatform) | 14:05:08 |
| pouspous | (or at least I would find it nice to remove it by default) | 14:06:10 |
| pouspous | * once https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/274853 is merged into master we'll be able to fully cross-compile nixos-star64 and thus remove lib.optionals (stdenv.buildPlatform == stdenv.hostPlatform) | 14:06:39 |
| fgaz | pouspous: I don't understand the connection between the two and why you want to remove that line | 14:49:41 |
| fgaz | * pouspous: I don't understand the connection between the two and why you want to remove that line | 14:50:22 |
| fgaz | cross-compiled build time dependencies aren't going to help native builds, they have different hashes | 14:51:20 |
| fgaz | by the way, I plan to remove that part completely once I finish setting up my attic cache | 14:53:52 |
| pouspous | oh I didn't know that's a shame. so cross-compiling (say from x86_64 to riscv64) package in system.extraDependencies will still trigger a recompilation of those packages when request on the riscv machine ? | 14:56:42 |
| pouspous | * oh I didn't know that's a shame. so cross-compiling (say from x86_64 to riscv64) packages in system.extraDependencies will still trigger a recompilation of those packages when request on the riscv machine ? | 14:57:52 |
| pouspous | I might not get the purpose of system.extraDependencies | 15:13:26 |
| pouspous | I understand this option as being a list of packages that must remain on the system, even if not necessarily referenced by anything in the store, right ? | 15:15:02 |
| fgaz | In reply to @pouspous:matrix.org
oh I didn't know that's a shame. so cross-compiling (say from x86_64 to riscv64) packages in system.extraDependencies will still trigger a recompilation of those packages when request on the riscv machine ? that's correct, and is the reason why I wrote that conditional | 15:20:48 |
| fgaz | In reply to @pouspous:matrix.org
I understand this option as being a list of packages that must remain on the system, even if not necessarily referenced by anything in the store, right ? yes, and I use it as sort of a lighter version of system.includeBuildDependencies | 15:21:36 |
| pouspous | So why do cross-compiled packages in system.extraDependencies need recompilation when requested on the native machine, but not packages in environment.systemPackages. Them too should have a different hash right ? | 15:50:57 |
| pouspous | * So why do cross-compiled packages in system.extraDependencies need recompilation when requested on the native machine, but not packages in environment.systemPackages ? Them too should have a different hash right ? | 15:51:18 |
| pouspous | * So why do cross-compiled packages in system.extraDependencies need recompilation when requested on the native machine, but not packages in environment.systemPackages ? Them too should have a different hash, right ? | 15:51:29 |
| fgaz | pouspous: both require recompilation. If you try to nixos-rebuild from a star64 that was flashed with a cross image, it will try to rebuild everything from the ground up | 15:57:37 |
