| 5 Apr 2024 |
liberodark | Currently it is Debian which is offered on my infrastructure.
But I can make the C910 and JH7110 completely available to you in case you want to have nixos on it, which I would understand. | 11:35:25 |
liberodark | If of course it can be useful to you. | 11:36:28 |
liberodark | Best Regards | 11:36:31 |
| @lsbgkdlpqhswnccwnabaflt:matrix.org joined the room. | 17:34:09 |
👉@crystallinefire:chat.solarpunk.moe | Alex have you encountered an issue with openldap-2.6.7-riscv64-linux | 23:36:17 |
| 6 Apr 2024 |
Alex | In reply to @hive:the-apothecary.club Alex have you encountered an issue with openldap-2.6.7-riscv64-linux I don't appear to have built it recently.
(At the moment I'm focused on building GHC, so it's unlikely I've built anything outside of the closure of GHC or a full NixOS system.) | 00:41:34 |
👉@crystallinefire:chat.solarpunk.moe | alright | 00:41:53 |
👉@crystallinefire:chat.solarpunk.moe | as far as i know this is something you would need for a full nixos system but i could be wrong | 00:42:34 |
Alex | In reply to @hive:the-apothecary.club as far as i know this is something you would need for a full nixos system but i could be wrong Nope.
[nixos@nixos:~]$ nix-store -qR /run/current-system | grep -we openldap
[nixos@nixos:~]$
| 00:43:54 |
👉@crystallinefire:chat.solarpunk.moe | rats | 00:44:54 |
Alex | (And this system is on a recent nixos-unstable commit) | 00:44:56 |
👉@crystallinefire:chat.solarpunk.moe | is there a way to see what it's being required by ? | 00:46:14 |
👉@crystallinefire:chat.solarpunk.moe | ┃ │ ┌─ ⚠ openldap-2.6.7-riscv64-linux failed with exit code 2 after ⏱ 49m29s in checkPhase
┃ │ ┌─ ⏸ apr-util-1.6.3-riscv64-linux
┃ │ ┌─ ⏸ serf-1.3.10-riscv64-linux
┃ ├─ ⏸ subversion-client-1.14.3-riscv64-linux
┃ ┌─ ⏸ git-with-svn-2.44.0-riscv64-linux
┃ ├─ ⏵ strace-6.8-riscv64-linux ⏱ 8s
┃ ┌─ ⏸ system-path-riscv64-linux
nom shows this | 00:46:31 |
Alex | nix why-depends
See man nix3-why-depends | 00:46:35 |
👉@crystallinefire:chat.solarpunk.moe | ok | 00:46:38 |
Alex | The nom tree looks pretty clear btw: you have a git package in your path -- is that gitFull instead of the regular git? | 00:47:26 |
👉@crystallinefire:chat.solarpunk.moe | i'll check | 00:47:44 |
👉@crystallinefire:chat.solarpunk.moe | oh yeah that was it thank u | 00:48:48 |
| 7 Apr 2024 |
Alex | In reply to @skeuchel:matrix.org Here are my estimates
On the pioneer: Unregisterised release+profiled_libs: >30h Unregisterised quick+no_profiled_libs: 18h Registerised release+profiled_libs: 12h Registerised quick+no_profiled_libs: 9h
Using qemu user-mode Registerised release+profiled_libs: 8h Registerised quick+no_profiled_libs: 6h
I've measured ~22h for building an unregisterised GHC 9.2.8 booted via an unregisterised GHC 8.10.7 when running on VF2 (JH7110 SoC).
(Default flavour with profiled libraries, dynamic libraries, and documentation enabled.)
One minor difference to a typical RV64GC build is that I also enable Zba and Zbb.
I have no idea what performance impact this has on my hardware.
That a Milk-V Pioneer would take over 30h to do the same is surprising. | 10:55:37 |
Pratham Patel | Another spec bump for the Oasis: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sophon-sg2380-new-choice-aipc-%E7%AE%97%E8%83%BD-rychc/ | 10:56:15 |
Alex | In reply to @alex:tunstall.xyz
I've measured ~22h for building an unregisterised GHC 9.2.8 booted via an unregisterised GHC 8.10.7 when running on VF2 (JH7110 SoC).
(Default flavour with profiled libraries, dynamic libraries, and documentation enabled.)
One minor difference to a typical RV64GC build is that I also enable Zba and Zbb.
I have no idea what performance impact this has on my hardware.
That a Milk-V Pioneer would take over 30h to do the same is surprising. I just remembered that I have logs, so:
configurePhase completed in 1 minutes 37 seconds
buildPhase completed in 21 hours 32 minutes 2 seconds
installPhase completed in 8 minutes 33 seconds
fixupPhase completed in 4 minutes 7 seconds
(unpack and patch phases don't appear to log timings.) | 11:00:55 |
[0x4A6F] | Are you running on SDcard or NVMe on the VF2? | 11:06:04 |
Alex | NVMe | 11:06:10 |
| 8 Apr 2024 |
Alex | I'm getting the following error when trying to build certain Haskell packages with a registerised GHC.
Couldn't find a target code interpreter. Try with -fexternal-interpreter
I thought registerised GHC included TemplateHaskell support?
Steven Keuchel do I need the patches that enable GHCi for this to work? | 06:29:08 |
| @cnx:loang.net joined the room. | 07:19:41 |
@cnx:loang.net | In reply to @alex:tunstall.xyz NVMe is it possible to boot from a bcachefs partition comprise of nvme, emmc and (us | 07:23:39 |
@cnx:loang.net | * is it possible to boot from a bcachefs partition comprise of nvme, emmc and (usb-connected) ssd? | 07:23:47 |
@cnx:loang.net | ah nvm u-boot doesn't seem to support bcachefs | 07:52:07 |
Pratham Patel | you can keep /boot as ext4 and /boot/efi as efi and other partitions as bcachefs | 07:53:10 |
Pratham Patel | cnx: ^^^ | 07:53:26 |