!zghijEASpYQWYFzriI:nixos.org

Hydra

377 Members
109 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
29 May 2023
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius Vladimír Čunát: I'm still unable to compare across jobsets using evaluation ID directly 08:08:56
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariushttps://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1795532?compare=1795635&full=008:08:56
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariushere's for example I cannot see "newly failing jobs", etc.08:09:02
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusam I holding it wrong?08:09:10
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat
In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
am I holding it wrong?
You're doing it right.
08:09:37
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatBut as I wrote, you can't in practice compare nixos: jobsets with nixpkgs: ones.08:09:58
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusSo, hm, is this a Hydra limitation for now?08:10:00
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusAaah sorry08:10:03
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatNo. Because they name the jobs differently.08:10:05
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat * No. Because they name the jobs differently.08:10:07
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI missed the message about the impossibility of comparing08:10:18
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat Nixos jobsets prefix nixpkgs jobs with nixpkgs. 08:10:25
@k900:0upti.meK900We should fix that tbh08:10:38
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusHow would you fix it K900?08:10:49
@k900:0upti.meK900Just have the same structure for all the jobsets08:11:01
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatUnified namespace would be better I guess.08:11:06
@k900:0upti.meK900And probably put them under one project too08:11:15
* @raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius nods08:11:22
@k900:0upti.meK900Graham had a more detailed proposal08:11:50
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusis this somewhere?08:11:57
@k900:0upti.meK900In the infra room like a year ago08:12:35
@k900:0upti.meK900I think it was for 22.0508:12:38
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI see08:13:31
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI guess this is the moment if we want to cram in such a large scale change for 23.1108:13:46
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatJobsets for release branches don't really suffer from this.08:17:23
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat Oh, staging-next-YY.MM does, actually. 08:17:50
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat(but I don't think we need compatibility in that one)08:18:18
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI meant it more as "to avoid disturbing" the whole machinery?08:23:43
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusUnsure about what can go wrong by aligning everything08:23:45
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatchannel update scripts refer to some jobs by the name, etc. Anyway, we're in a wrong channel for this.08:24:47

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6