| 28 Jun 2025 |
 @aftix:matrix.org | I had something similar which happened since the disk was full | 03:01:48 |
 hexa | oh yeah, watermark level 🙂 | 03:04:21 |
| hexa | minimumDiskFree[Evaluator] | 03:04:47 |
 ElvishJerricco | that has never been a problem before, and my disk is not as full as it has been in the past | 03:05:34 |
| ElvishJerricco | how would I check if that's it? | 03:05:43 |
| hexa | did you configure a limit? | 03:09:11 |
| ElvishJerricco | nope | 03:09:20 |
| hexa | then the feature is probably not enabled | 03:09:40 |
| hexa | you can inspect the internal state of the queue-runner by appending /queue-runner-status to the baseur | 03:11:59 |
| hexa | * you can inspect the internal state of the queue-runner by appending /queue-runner-status to the base url | 03:12:03 |
| hexa | relevant is whether there are runnables, because only those jobs are ready to be scheduled | 03:12:59 |
| hexa | ideally consecutiveFailures is 0 for all builders | 03:13:17 |
| ElvishJerricco | "machineTypes" : {
"x86_64-linux:kvm,nixos-test" : {
"runnable" : 5,
"running" : 0
},
"x86_64-linux:local" : {
"runnable" : 0,
"running" : 0
}
},
"consecutiveFailures" : 1, for the builder, presumably because I canceled a build
| 03:17:54 |
| hexa | does the builder have the relevant system features? | 03:30:49 |
| ElvishJerricco | Yep | 03:30:55 |
